TY - JOUR
T1 - Surface Feature Prediction for Laser Ablated 40Cr13 Stainless Steel Based on Extreme Learning Machine
AU - Yin, Zhenshuo
AU - Liu, Qiang
AU - Sun, Pengpeng
AU - Zhou, Yinuo
AU - Ning, Zhiwei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Determining an optimal combination of laser process parameters can significantly improve the efficiency and quality of 40Cr13 steel surface processing. In this study, two machine learning models (ELMSS and ELMPS) were proposed to predict the processing results of surface features to optimize process parameters. The prediction accuracies of the proposed models were always higher than those of traditional back propagation (BP) and radial basis function (RBF) neural networks, and the calculation time of the proposed models was significantly reduced. In comparison, the prediction accuracy ranking for ablation depth was ELMSS (92.6%), BP (89.8%), and RBF (89.6%), and for the ablation width, it was ELMSS (98.3%), BP (97.4%), and RBF (96.1%). The material removal rate was 92.4%, 91.1%, and 89.1% for ELMSS, BP, and RBF, respectively. Finally, the prediction accuracy ranking for surface roughness was 86.8%, 80.7%, and 79.5% for ELMPS, BP, and RBF, respectively. After optimization by the genetic algorithm, the prediction accuracies of the proposed models for the depth, width, material removal rate, and surface roughness reached 94.0%, 99.0%, 93.2%, and 91.2%, respectively. With the support of ELMSS and ELMPS, the results of the surface features can be predicted before machining and the appropriate process parameters can be selected in advance.
AB - Determining an optimal combination of laser process parameters can significantly improve the efficiency and quality of 40Cr13 steel surface processing. In this study, two machine learning models (ELMSS and ELMPS) were proposed to predict the processing results of surface features to optimize process parameters. The prediction accuracies of the proposed models were always higher than those of traditional back propagation (BP) and radial basis function (RBF) neural networks, and the calculation time of the proposed models was significantly reduced. In comparison, the prediction accuracy ranking for ablation depth was ELMSS (92.6%), BP (89.8%), and RBF (89.6%), and for the ablation width, it was ELMSS (98.3%), BP (97.4%), and RBF (96.1%). The material removal rate was 92.4%, 91.1%, and 89.1% for ELMSS, BP, and RBF, respectively. Finally, the prediction accuracy ranking for surface roughness was 86.8%, 80.7%, and 79.5% for ELMPS, BP, and RBF, respectively. After optimization by the genetic algorithm, the prediction accuracies of the proposed models for the depth, width, material removal rate, and surface roughness reached 94.0%, 99.0%, 93.2%, and 91.2%, respectively. With the support of ELMSS and ELMPS, the results of the surface features can be predicted before machining and the appropriate process parameters can be selected in advance.
KW - 40Cr13 stainless steel
KW - extreme learning machine
KW - feature prediction
KW - genetic algorithm
KW - laser ablation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85146439371
U2 - 10.3390/ma16020505
DO - 10.3390/ma16020505
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85146439371
SN - 1996-1944
VL - 16
JO - Materials
JF - Materials
IS - 2
M1 - 505
ER -