TY - JOUR
T1 - Study of Magnetic Focusing Structures for 220 GHz Sheet Beam Traveling Wave Tubes
AU - Shu, Guoxiang
AU - Pan, Huaxing
AU - Xie, Xinlun
AU - Ma, Shaocheng
AU - Tang, Jiawei
AU - Liu, Siyuan
AU - Li, Mingze
AU - Ruan, Cunjun
AU - He, Wenlong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2011-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The study of three types of magnetic focusing structures for terahertz band sheet beam traveling wave tubes is presented in this article. Although there are a lot of reported literatures regarding the study of magnetic focusing structures, most of them just focused on a single type of focusing structure and lack of systematic research (for example, only simulation study), with a limited discourse on the comparative performance across different types of focusing structures. In addition, many reported simulations regarding the focusing structures are normally based on the ideal electron beam, resulting in reduced simulation accuracy to some extent. In this article, three types of focusing structures (uniform magnetic (UM) / pole offset periodic cusped magnetic (PO-PCM)/PCM-tunable quadrupolar magnet focusing structures) are studied in detail by theoretical analysis and simulation design. The PO-PCM focusing structure is experimentally studied as a representative. Simulation results based on the electron beam emitted from the designed sheet beam electron gun show that a stable long-distance transmission over 112 mm and 85 mm can be achieved with the UM focusing structure and the PCM focusing structures, respectively. To verify the design, the microfabrication and test of the PO-PCM focusing structure is carried out as a representative. The measured magnetic field matches well with its simulated and theoretically calculated counterparts. The beam-wave interaction cosimulation results based on different focusing structures have a discrepancy among them.
AB - The study of three types of magnetic focusing structures for terahertz band sheet beam traveling wave tubes is presented in this article. Although there are a lot of reported literatures regarding the study of magnetic focusing structures, most of them just focused on a single type of focusing structure and lack of systematic research (for example, only simulation study), with a limited discourse on the comparative performance across different types of focusing structures. In addition, many reported simulations regarding the focusing structures are normally based on the ideal electron beam, resulting in reduced simulation accuracy to some extent. In this article, three types of focusing structures (uniform magnetic (UM) / pole offset periodic cusped magnetic (PO-PCM)/PCM-tunable quadrupolar magnet focusing structures) are studied in detail by theoretical analysis and simulation design. The PO-PCM focusing structure is experimentally studied as a representative. Simulation results based on the electron beam emitted from the designed sheet beam electron gun show that a stable long-distance transmission over 112 mm and 85 mm can be achieved with the UM focusing structure and the PCM focusing structures, respectively. To verify the design, the microfabrication and test of the PO-PCM focusing structure is carried out as a representative. The measured magnetic field matches well with its simulated and theoretically calculated counterparts. The beam-wave interaction cosimulation results based on different focusing structures have a discrepancy among them.
KW - Electron optics system
KW - magnetic focusing structure
KW - sheet beam traveling wave tube
KW - terahertz wave amplification
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85207422252
U2 - 10.1109/TTHZ.2024.3484953
DO - 10.1109/TTHZ.2024.3484953
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85207422252
SN - 2156-342X
VL - 15
SP - 120
EP - 127
JO - IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology
JF - IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology
IS - 1
ER -