TY - GEN
T1 - Simulation Analysis and Prediction of Lumbar Spine Injury Biomechanics in Upright, Reclining, and Lying Postures Under Lunar Reentry Loads
AU - Jin, Mengmeng
AU - Liu, Zhongqi
AU - Zhou, Qianxiang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This study aims to investigate the biomechanical impact of lying, reclining, and upright seating postures on lumbar spine injuries under lunar reentry loads. According to the aerospace medicine selection standard, a detailed three-dimensional finite element model of the lumbar spine including vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and ligaments was established. The model was verified by the range of motion test and the spinal experiments test. Subsequently, the biomechanical effects of astronauts’ lumbar injuries in lying, 50° reclined, and upright seating postures were analyzed for the two kinds of reentry loads of Chang’e-5 T1 (CE-5T1) vehicle and the Apollo 10 spacecraft, and the evaluation and prediction of lumbar spine injuries were conducted in conjunction with the biological tissue injury criteria. The simulation results indicated that, under both loads, the stress values of vertebrae in lying, 50° reclined, and upright seating postures increased, and the rate of increase rose. When the peak acceleration of CE-5T1 approached 9 G, the vertebral stress reached the maximum with 104.85 MPa, 99.32 MPa, and 80.21 MPa in the lying, 50° reclined, and upright seating postures, respectively. The vertebral displacement also increased from 11.13 mm to 13.77 mm and 15.22 mm, which increased by approximately 23.2% and 36.7% compared to the lying posture. Under both reentry loads, the maximum stress on the intervertebral discs was located at the L4–5 segment. Combined with the Axis Dynamic Response Criteria for spinal injury (MDRC), the MDRC values in the upright seating posture were 0.71 and 0.58 for CE-5T1 and Apollo 10 reentry loads, respectively. While these values did not reach the spinal injury threshold of 1, they were higher than those for the lying and 50° reclined seating postures, indicating that reentry load in upright seating posture may cause damage to the lumbar and pose a risk to astronauts’ health and safety. This study provides scientific evidence for the design of return capsule seats, recommending that the sitting posture angles be carefully considered for lumbar biomechanics to reduce the risk of lumbar injury under high reentry loads and ensure the health and safety of astronauts.
AB - This study aims to investigate the biomechanical impact of lying, reclining, and upright seating postures on lumbar spine injuries under lunar reentry loads. According to the aerospace medicine selection standard, a detailed three-dimensional finite element model of the lumbar spine including vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and ligaments was established. The model was verified by the range of motion test and the spinal experiments test. Subsequently, the biomechanical effects of astronauts’ lumbar injuries in lying, 50° reclined, and upright seating postures were analyzed for the two kinds of reentry loads of Chang’e-5 T1 (CE-5T1) vehicle and the Apollo 10 spacecraft, and the evaluation and prediction of lumbar spine injuries were conducted in conjunction with the biological tissue injury criteria. The simulation results indicated that, under both loads, the stress values of vertebrae in lying, 50° reclined, and upright seating postures increased, and the rate of increase rose. When the peak acceleration of CE-5T1 approached 9 G, the vertebral stress reached the maximum with 104.85 MPa, 99.32 MPa, and 80.21 MPa in the lying, 50° reclined, and upright seating postures, respectively. The vertebral displacement also increased from 11.13 mm to 13.77 mm and 15.22 mm, which increased by approximately 23.2% and 36.7% compared to the lying posture. Under both reentry loads, the maximum stress on the intervertebral discs was located at the L4–5 segment. Combined with the Axis Dynamic Response Criteria for spinal injury (MDRC), the MDRC values in the upright seating posture were 0.71 and 0.58 for CE-5T1 and Apollo 10 reentry loads, respectively. While these values did not reach the spinal injury threshold of 1, they were higher than those for the lying and 50° reclined seating postures, indicating that reentry load in upright seating posture may cause damage to the lumbar and pose a risk to astronauts’ health and safety. This study provides scientific evidence for the design of return capsule seats, recommending that the sitting posture angles be carefully considered for lumbar biomechanics to reduce the risk of lumbar injury under high reentry loads and ensure the health and safety of astronauts.
KW - angle of seating posture
KW - biomechanics
KW - finite element analysis
KW - lumbar spine injury
KW - reentry load
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008192267
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-93845-0_26
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-93845-0_26
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:105008192267
SN - 9783031938443
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science
SP - 374
EP - 386
BT - Human-Computer Interaction - Thematic Area, HCI 2025, Held as Part of the 27th HCI International Conference, HCII 2025, Proceedings
A2 - Kurosu, Masaaki
A2 - Hashizume, Ayako
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - Human Computer Interaction thematic area of the 27th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2025
Y2 - 22 June 2025 through 27 June 2025
ER -