跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Performance comparison of two truth telling incentive mechanisms: An experimental method

  • Beihang University
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology

科研成果: 书/报告/会议事项章节会议稿件同行评审

摘要

An experiment of predicting the result of the National Basketball Association (NBA) is designed to compare the performance of Bayesian truth serum (BTS) and robust Bayesian truth serum (RBTS) in expert truth telling incentive. It shows that 1) the fundamental hypothesis of BTS, i.e. individuals treating personal opinions as an 'impersonally informative' signal about the population distribution, is valid; 2) the relative position of the individual in a group significantly affects the individual's score of RBTS due to RBTS algorithm, which leads to a poor incentive to tell truth, while BTS does not have this problem; 3) BTS does not encourage extreme opinions, while RBTS cannot effectively reward the extreme opinions due to significant deviation of their RBTS scores. The analytic results prefer to BTS, but when the number of individuals is small, RBTS should be employed.

源语言英语
主期刊名2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM 2016
出版商IEEE Computer Society
1085-1090
页数6
ISBN(电子版)9781509036653
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 27 12月 2016
活动2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM 2016 - Bali, 印度尼西亚
期限: 4 12月 20167 12月 2016

出版系列

姓名IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
2016-December
ISSN(印刷版)2157-3611
ISSN(电子版)2157-362X

会议

会议2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM 2016
国家/地区印度尼西亚
Bali
时期4/12/167/12/16

指纹

探究 'Performance comparison of two truth telling incentive mechanisms: An experimental method' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此