TY - GEN
T1 - OMNI-MATH
T2 - 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025
AU - Gao, Bofei
AU - Song, Feifan
AU - Yang, Zhe
AU - Cai, Zefan
AU - Miao, Yibo
AU - Dong, Qingxiu
AU - Li, Lei
AU - Ma, Chenghao
AU - Chen, Liang
AU - Xu, Runxin
AU - Tang, Zhengyang
AU - Wang, Benyou
AU - Zan, Daoguang
AU - Quan, Shanghaoran
AU - Zhang, Ge
AU - Sha, Lei
AU - Zhang, Yichang
AU - Ren, Xuancheng
AU - Liu, Tianyu
AU - Chang, Baobao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to significant breakthroughs in mathematical reasoning capabilities. However, existing benchmarks like GSM8K or MATH are now being solved with high accuracy (e.g., OpenAI o1 achieves 94.8% on MATH dataset), indicating their inadequacy for truly challenging these models. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive and challenging benchmark specifically designed to assess LLMs' mathematical reasoning at the Olympiad level. Unlike existing Olympiad-related benchmarks, our dataset focuses exclusively on mathematics and comprises a vast collection of 4428 competition-level problems with rigorous human annotation. These problems are meticulously categorized into over 33 sub-domains and span more than 10 distinct difficulty levels, enabling a holistic assessment of model performance in Olympiad-mathematical reasoning. Furthermore, we conducted an in-depth analysis based on this benchmark. Our experimental results show that even the most advanced models, OpenAI o1-mini and OpenAI o1-preview, struggle with highly challenging Olympiad-level problems, with 60.54% and 52.55% accuracy, highlighting significant challenges in Olympiad-level mathematical reasoning.
AB - Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to significant breakthroughs in mathematical reasoning capabilities. However, existing benchmarks like GSM8K or MATH are now being solved with high accuracy (e.g., OpenAI o1 achieves 94.8% on MATH dataset), indicating their inadequacy for truly challenging these models. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive and challenging benchmark specifically designed to assess LLMs' mathematical reasoning at the Olympiad level. Unlike existing Olympiad-related benchmarks, our dataset focuses exclusively on mathematics and comprises a vast collection of 4428 competition-level problems with rigorous human annotation. These problems are meticulously categorized into over 33 sub-domains and span more than 10 distinct difficulty levels, enabling a holistic assessment of model performance in Olympiad-mathematical reasoning. Furthermore, we conducted an in-depth analysis based on this benchmark. Our experimental results show that even the most advanced models, OpenAI o1-mini and OpenAI o1-preview, struggle with highly challenging Olympiad-level problems, with 60.54% and 52.55% accuracy, highlighting significant challenges in Olympiad-level mathematical reasoning.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010271782
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:105010271782
T3 - 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025
SP - 98023
EP - 98052
BT - 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025
PB - International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR
Y2 - 24 April 2025 through 28 April 2025
ER -