TY - JOUR
T1 - Network-based integer programming models for flexible process planning
AU - Luo, Kaiping
AU - Sun, Jianfei
AU - Guo, Liuwei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Flexible process planning (FPP) involves selecting and sequencing the requisite operations according to technological requirements, and meanwhile allocating a right machine, a right tool and a right access direction to each selected operation by a given criterion. In this article, the FPP problem is exactly and concisely formulated as linear integer programming models based on the topology of the AND/OR-network under two criteria: production cost minimisation and completion time minimisation. Distinctively, more flexible manufacturing elements and process plan evaluation criteria are considered; more complicated tool and access direction changeover identifications are linearly expressed without the big-M parameter. Compared with the latest mathematical programming models for process planning, the proposed models have lower complexity and better performance. The results from numerous comparative experiments indicate that (i) the number of decision variables of the proposed models reduces approximately by 68% and the number of constraints of the proposed models dramatically reduces by 99%; (ii) within the same running time, the proposed models can exactly solve more benchmark cases than the latest models; and (iii) the solutions obtained by the proposed models are also better than the best ones founded by some state-of-the-art meta-heuristic algorithms.
AB - Flexible process planning (FPP) involves selecting and sequencing the requisite operations according to technological requirements, and meanwhile allocating a right machine, a right tool and a right access direction to each selected operation by a given criterion. In this article, the FPP problem is exactly and concisely formulated as linear integer programming models based on the topology of the AND/OR-network under two criteria: production cost minimisation and completion time minimisation. Distinctively, more flexible manufacturing elements and process plan evaluation criteria are considered; more complicated tool and access direction changeover identifications are linearly expressed without the big-M parameter. Compared with the latest mathematical programming models for process planning, the proposed models have lower complexity and better performance. The results from numerous comparative experiments indicate that (i) the number of decision variables of the proposed models reduces approximately by 68% and the number of constraints of the proposed models dramatically reduces by 99%; (ii) within the same running time, the proposed models can exactly solve more benchmark cases than the latest models; and (iii) the solutions obtained by the proposed models are also better than the best ones founded by some state-of-the-art meta-heuristic algorithms.
KW - Flexible manufacturing systems
KW - combinatorial optimisation
KW - computer-aided manufacturing
KW - flexible process planning
KW - integer programming
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85130964569
U2 - 10.1080/00207543.2022.2077671
DO - 10.1080/00207543.2022.2077671
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85130964569
SN - 0020-7543
VL - 61
SP - 3087
EP - 3101
JO - International Journal of Production Research
JF - International Journal of Production Research
IS - 9
ER -