TY - GEN
T1 - Multi-Dimensional Safety Assessments of LLM-Assisted Driving Systems
AU - Hou, Chenfei
AU - Wei, Henglai
AU - Han, Xuefeng
AU - Zhang, Hui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Large language models (LLMs), AI systems trained to process and generate human language, are increasingly being integrated into autonomous vehicles, leading to the emergence of LLM-assisted driving systems (LADSs). Rigorous evaluation of LADSs is essential for driving technological progress and building user trust. However, there is currently a lack of specific evaluation metrics for LADSs, and existing LLM evaluation methods are not readily applicable to LADSs. To evaluate the performance of LADSs, this study proposes four assessment indices that collectively consider driving robustness, safety, and ethical decision-making. First, cosine similarity is employed to guide the injection of disturbances, establishing a basis for quantitative input-output analysis. Second, robustness and safety indices are proposed to characterize vehicle performance, while an LLM-based evaluator is used to assess ethical behavior. To enhance alignment with human judgment, a language-numerical optimization algorithm is developed for prompt tuning. By integrating the knowledge base, Cohen's Kappa (κ) between the experienced driver and the LLM-based evaluator reaches 0.81, indicating strong agreement. Additionally, this study first identifies and analyzes a novel phenomenon termed "extreme thinking". Building on these results, a multi-dimensional safety assessment index is proposed to evaluate LADSs. The proposed indices and methods are validated using over 1000 data segments collected from both simulations and experiments.
AB - Large language models (LLMs), AI systems trained to process and generate human language, are increasingly being integrated into autonomous vehicles, leading to the emergence of LLM-assisted driving systems (LADSs). Rigorous evaluation of LADSs is essential for driving technological progress and building user trust. However, there is currently a lack of specific evaluation metrics for LADSs, and existing LLM evaluation methods are not readily applicable to LADSs. To evaluate the performance of LADSs, this study proposes four assessment indices that collectively consider driving robustness, safety, and ethical decision-making. First, cosine similarity is employed to guide the injection of disturbances, establishing a basis for quantitative input-output analysis. Second, robustness and safety indices are proposed to characterize vehicle performance, while an LLM-based evaluator is used to assess ethical behavior. To enhance alignment with human judgment, a language-numerical optimization algorithm is developed for prompt tuning. By integrating the knowledge base, Cohen's Kappa (κ) between the experienced driver and the LLM-based evaluator reaches 0.81, indicating strong agreement. Additionally, this study first identifies and analyzes a novel phenomenon termed "extreme thinking". Building on these results, a multi-dimensional safety assessment index is proposed to evaluate LADSs. The proposed indices and methods are validated using over 1000 data segments collected from both simulations and experiments.
KW - LLM-assisted driving systems
KW - Performance assessment
KW - driving decision
KW - driving ethics
KW - driving safety
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024709519
U2 - 10.1109/IECON58223.2025.11221958
DO - 10.1109/IECON58223.2025.11221958
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:105024709519
T3 - IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference)
BT - IECON 2025 - 51st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 51st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2025
Y2 - 14 October 2025 through 17 October 2025
ER -