TY - JOUR
T1 - Lp estimates for bilinear and multiparameter hilbert transforms
AU - Dai, Wei
AU - Lu, Guozhen
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Muscalu, Pipher, Tao and Thiele proved that the standard bilinear and biparameter Hilbert transform does not satisfy any Lp estimates. They also raised a question asking if a bilinear and biparameter multiplier operator defined by satisfies any Lp estimates, where the symbol m satisfies for sufficiently many multi-indices α = (α1, α2) and β = (β1, β2), Γi (i = 1, 2) are subspaces in R2 and dim Γ1 = 0, dim Γ2 = 1. Silva partially answered this question and proved that Tm maps Lp1 × Lp2 →Lp boundedly when 1/p1 + 1/p2 = 1/p with p1, p2 >1, 1/p1 + 2/p2 <2 and 1/p2 C 2/p1 <2. One notes that the admissible range here for these tuples (p1, p2, p) is a proper subset of the admissible range of the bilinear Hilbert transform (BHT) derived by Lacey and Thiele. We establish the same Lp estimates as BHT in the full range for the bilinear and d-parameter (d ≥ 2) Hilbert transforms with arbitrary symbols satisfying appropriate decay assumptions and having singularity sets Γ1, . . . , Γd with dim Γi = 0 for i = 1, . . . , d-1 and dim Γd = 1. Moreover, we establish the same Lp estimates as BHT for bilinear and biparameter Fourier multipliers of symbols with dim Γ1=dim Γ2=1 and satisfying some appropriate decay estimates. In particular, our results include the Lp estimates as BHT in the full range for certain modified bilinear and biparameter Hilbert transforms of tensor-product type with dim Γ1 = dim Γ2 = 1 but with a slightly better logarithmic decay than that of the bilinear and biparameter Hilbert transform BHT⊗BHT.
AB - Muscalu, Pipher, Tao and Thiele proved that the standard bilinear and biparameter Hilbert transform does not satisfy any Lp estimates. They also raised a question asking if a bilinear and biparameter multiplier operator defined by satisfies any Lp estimates, where the symbol m satisfies for sufficiently many multi-indices α = (α1, α2) and β = (β1, β2), Γi (i = 1, 2) are subspaces in R2 and dim Γ1 = 0, dim Γ2 = 1. Silva partially answered this question and proved that Tm maps Lp1 × Lp2 →Lp boundedly when 1/p1 + 1/p2 = 1/p with p1, p2 >1, 1/p1 + 2/p2 <2 and 1/p2 C 2/p1 <2. One notes that the admissible range here for these tuples (p1, p2, p) is a proper subset of the admissible range of the bilinear Hilbert transform (BHT) derived by Lacey and Thiele. We establish the same Lp estimates as BHT in the full range for the bilinear and d-parameter (d ≥ 2) Hilbert transforms with arbitrary symbols satisfying appropriate decay assumptions and having singularity sets Γ1, . . . , Γd with dim Γi = 0 for i = 1, . . . , d-1 and dim Γd = 1. Moreover, we establish the same Lp estimates as BHT for bilinear and biparameter Fourier multipliers of symbols with dim Γ1=dim Γ2=1 and satisfying some appropriate decay estimates. In particular, our results include the Lp estimates as BHT in the full range for certain modified bilinear and biparameter Hilbert transforms of tensor-product type with dim Γ1 = dim Γ2 = 1 but with a slightly better logarithmic decay than that of the bilinear and biparameter Hilbert transform BHT⊗BHT.
KW - Bilinear and multiparameter hilbert transforms
KW - Hölder estimates
KW - L estimates
KW - Multiparameter paraproducts
KW - Polydiscs
KW - Wave packets
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84931365592
U2 - 10.2140/apde.2015.8.675
DO - 10.2140/apde.2015.8.675
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84931365592
SN - 2157-5045
VL - 8
SP - 675
EP - 712
JO - Analysis and PDE
JF - Analysis and PDE
IS - 3
ER -