TY - JOUR
T1 - Lifthitz Transition and Shadow Gap in Li(Fe1−xCox)As Investigated by STM/STS
AU - Liu, Ruizhe
AU - Ye, Zhiyang
AU - Wang, Jihui
AU - Liu, Limin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Recently, APRES experiments reported a superconducting (SC) gap opened on a shallow insulating band in Co-doped LiFeAs (Miao et al. 6:6056, 2015). Theoretically, this particular SC gap is characterized by asymmetric density of states (DOS) and vanishing of SC coherence peak, addressed as shadow gap. Using the scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS), 1% and 3% Co-doped LiFeAs were studied. The Co dopants were atomically resolved. STS results at the Co sites on both samples showed no bound states. Negligible difference between spectra at Co sites and defect-free area was observed, suggesting weak impurity potentials of the Co dopants. Similar to LiFeAs, two SC coherence peaks at Δα = 5.6 meV and Δβ = 2.5 meV were observed in STS spectra of the 1% doped sample, which were the SC gaps of the inner hole band α and the outer hole band β. In the SC state, spectra of 3% Co-doped sample showed a broad peak at E1 = − 7.2 meV and other two peaks at ± 3.9 meV. Above Tc, the peak at E1 shifts to − 4.8 meV, and the peaks at ± 3.9 meV vanish. We showed that the distinct difference of STS results in 1% and 3% Co-doped LiFeAs was caused by Lifthitz transition and shadow gap on the shallow band. By fitting the spectra at low energies, we found the anisotropy of the β band was greatly increased when shadow gap opens on the shallow α band.
AB - Recently, APRES experiments reported a superconducting (SC) gap opened on a shallow insulating band in Co-doped LiFeAs (Miao et al. 6:6056, 2015). Theoretically, this particular SC gap is characterized by asymmetric density of states (DOS) and vanishing of SC coherence peak, addressed as shadow gap. Using the scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS), 1% and 3% Co-doped LiFeAs were studied. The Co dopants were atomically resolved. STS results at the Co sites on both samples showed no bound states. Negligible difference between spectra at Co sites and defect-free area was observed, suggesting weak impurity potentials of the Co dopants. Similar to LiFeAs, two SC coherence peaks at Δα = 5.6 meV and Δβ = 2.5 meV were observed in STS spectra of the 1% doped sample, which were the SC gaps of the inner hole band α and the outer hole band β. In the SC state, spectra of 3% Co-doped sample showed a broad peak at E1 = − 7.2 meV and other two peaks at ± 3.9 meV. Above Tc, the peak at E1 shifts to − 4.8 meV, and the peaks at ± 3.9 meV vanish. We showed that the distinct difference of STS results in 1% and 3% Co-doped LiFeAs was caused by Lifthitz transition and shadow gap on the shallow band. By fitting the spectra at low energies, we found the anisotropy of the β band was greatly increased when shadow gap opens on the shallow α band.
KW - High-T superconductor
KW - Iron-based superconductor
KW - LiFeCoAs
KW - Lifshitz transition
KW - Scanning tunneling microscopy
KW - Shadow gap
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85068118190
U2 - 10.1007/s10948-019-5123-3
DO - 10.1007/s10948-019-5123-3
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85068118190
SN - 1557-1939
VL - 32
SP - 3789
EP - 3795
JO - Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
JF - Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
IS - 12
ER -