TY - JOUR
T1 - Laminar Burning Velocity in Aviation Fuels
T2 - Conventional Kerosene, SAFs, and Key Hydrocarbon Components
AU - Song, Zehua
AU - Yan, Xinsai
AU - Liu, Ziyu
AU - Yang, Xiaoyi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) are vitally important for aviation decarbonization. The laminar burning velocity (LBV), a key parameter reflecting the combustion behavior of fuel/oxidizer mixtures, serves as a fundamental metric for evaluating SAF performance. This paper systematically reviews and evaluates the LBV experiment method and the performance of traditional aviation fuel, SAFs produced via different pathways, and individual components (n-alkanes, iso-alkanes, cycloalkanes, and aromatic hydrocarbons, as well as the impacts of isomers and homologues) in aviation fuels. It is found that LBV values of different SAFs exhibit significant fluctuations, approaching or slightly deviating from those of conventional aviation fuels. Carbon number, branching degree, substituent types, and testing methods in the components all affect LBV performance. Specifically, increased branching in iso-alkanes reduces LBV, cyclohexane and benzene show higher LBV than their methylated counterparts (methylcyclohexane and toluene), and n-alkylcyclohexanes/benzenes with short (C1–C3) side chains demonstrate minimal LBV variation. Spherical flame methods yield more consistent (and generally lower) LBV values than stagnation flame techniques. These findings provide insights for optimizing SAF–conventional fuel blends and enhancing drop-in compatibility while ensuring operational safety and usability.
AB - Sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) are vitally important for aviation decarbonization. The laminar burning velocity (LBV), a key parameter reflecting the combustion behavior of fuel/oxidizer mixtures, serves as a fundamental metric for evaluating SAF performance. This paper systematically reviews and evaluates the LBV experiment method and the performance of traditional aviation fuel, SAFs produced via different pathways, and individual components (n-alkanes, iso-alkanes, cycloalkanes, and aromatic hydrocarbons, as well as the impacts of isomers and homologues) in aviation fuels. It is found that LBV values of different SAFs exhibit significant fluctuations, approaching or slightly deviating from those of conventional aviation fuels. Carbon number, branching degree, substituent types, and testing methods in the components all affect LBV performance. Specifically, increased branching in iso-alkanes reduces LBV, cyclohexane and benzene show higher LBV than their methylated counterparts (methylcyclohexane and toluene), and n-alkylcyclohexanes/benzenes with short (C1–C3) side chains demonstrate minimal LBV variation. Spherical flame methods yield more consistent (and generally lower) LBV values than stagnation flame techniques. These findings provide insights for optimizing SAF–conventional fuel blends and enhancing drop-in compatibility while ensuring operational safety and usability.
KW - LBV
KW - SAFs
KW - aviation fuel components
KW - bio-jet fuel
KW - conventional aviation fuels
KW - synthetic fuels
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011859162
U2 - 10.3390/app15148098
DO - 10.3390/app15148098
M3 - 文献综述
AN - SCOPUS:105011859162
SN - 2076-3417
VL - 15
JO - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
JF - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
IS - 14
M1 - 8098
ER -