TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Long-Term Care Insurance on Institutional Care Admission Among Older Chinese Adults
T2 - Evidence from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study
AU - Wu, Aihui
AU - Jia, Hongbo
AU - Yang, Lei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Little is known about the effect of implementing a long-term care insurance (LTCI) program on long-term institutional care admissions. This study employs a quasi-experimental design to examine the impact of China’s LTCI pilot program on institutional care admissions among older adults. Using four waves (2013, 2015, 2018, and 2020) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study with 8,005 observations, difference-in-differences was applied to compare institutional care utilization between pilot and non-pilot cities before and after the 2016 policy implementation. Results demonstrate that LTCI significantly increases institutional care admission probability by 0.5%, indicating a profound behavioral impact despite modest absolute changes. The magnitude and direction of effect varies considerably across population subgroups. Age emerges as a key moderating factor, with older individuals showing stronger policy responsiveness. Functional disability presents a more complex pattern: while insurance coverage facilitates access for those with moderate care needs, the effect diminishes among severely disabled individuals for whom institutional care represents an unavoidable necessity. Metropolitan areas demonstrate substantially greater policy effectiveness compared to rural regions. The findings provide crucial evidence on how enabling factors in healthcare utilization operate within different demographic and geographic contexts, offering insights for policymakers designing LTCI systems in aging societies.
AB - Little is known about the effect of implementing a long-term care insurance (LTCI) program on long-term institutional care admissions. This study employs a quasi-experimental design to examine the impact of China’s LTCI pilot program on institutional care admissions among older adults. Using four waves (2013, 2015, 2018, and 2020) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study with 8,005 observations, difference-in-differences was applied to compare institutional care utilization between pilot and non-pilot cities before and after the 2016 policy implementation. Results demonstrate that LTCI significantly increases institutional care admission probability by 0.5%, indicating a profound behavioral impact despite modest absolute changes. The magnitude and direction of effect varies considerably across population subgroups. Age emerges as a key moderating factor, with older individuals showing stronger policy responsiveness. Functional disability presents a more complex pattern: while insurance coverage facilitates access for those with moderate care needs, the effect diminishes among severely disabled individuals for whom institutional care represents an unavoidable necessity. Metropolitan areas demonstrate substantially greater policy effectiveness compared to rural regions. The findings provide crucial evidence on how enabling factors in healthcare utilization operate within different demographic and geographic contexts, offering insights for policymakers designing LTCI systems in aging societies.
KW - Difference-in-differences method
KW - institutional care
KW - long-term care insurance
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023643513
U2 - 10.1080/08959420.2025.2587361
DO - 10.1080/08959420.2025.2587361
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105023643513
SN - 0895-9420
VL - 38
SP - 532
EP - 552
JO - Journal of Aging and Social Policy
JF - Journal of Aging and Social Policy
IS - 3
ER -