TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying early gastric cancer under magnifying narrow-band images with deep learning
T2 - a multicenter study
AU - Hu, Hao
AU - Gong, Lixin
AU - Dong, Di
AU - Zhu, Liang
AU - Wang, Min
AU - He, Jie
AU - Shu, Lei
AU - Cai, Yiling
AU - Cai, Shilun
AU - Su, Wei
AU - Zhong, Yunshi
AU - Li, Cong
AU - Zhu, Yongbei
AU - Fang, Mengjie
AU - Zhong, Lianzhen
AU - Yang, Xin
AU - Zhou, Pinghong
AU - Tian, Jie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background and Aims: Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy (ME-NBI) has shown advantages in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, proficiency in diagnostic algorithms requires substantial expertise and experience. In this study, we aimed to develop a computer-aided diagnostic model for EGM (EGCM) to analyze and assist in the diagnosis of EGC under ME-NBI. Methods: A total of 1777 ME-NBI images from 295 cases were collected from 3 centers. These cases were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 170), an internal test cohort (ITC, n = 73), and an external test cohort (ETC, n = 52). EGCM based on VGG-19 architecture (Visual Geometry Group [VGG], Oxford University, Oxford, UK) with a single fully connected 2-classification layer was developed through fine-tuning and validated on all cohorts. Furthermore, we compared the model with 8 endoscopists with varying experience. Primary comparison measures included accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: EGCM acquired AUCs of .808 in the ITC and .813 in the ETC. Moreover, EGCM achieved similar predictive performance as the senior endoscopists (accuracy: .770 vs .755, P = .355; sensitivity: .792 vs .767, P = .183; specificity: .745 vs .742, P = .931) but better than the junior endoscopists (accuracy: .770 vs .728, P < .05). After referring to the results of EGCM, the average diagnostic ability of the endoscopists was significantly improved in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV (P < .05). Conclusions: EGCM exhibited comparable performance with senior endoscopists in the diagnosis of EGC and showed the potential value in aiding and improving the diagnosis of EGC by endoscopists.
AB - Background and Aims: Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy (ME-NBI) has shown advantages in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, proficiency in diagnostic algorithms requires substantial expertise and experience. In this study, we aimed to develop a computer-aided diagnostic model for EGM (EGCM) to analyze and assist in the diagnosis of EGC under ME-NBI. Methods: A total of 1777 ME-NBI images from 295 cases were collected from 3 centers. These cases were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 170), an internal test cohort (ITC, n = 73), and an external test cohort (ETC, n = 52). EGCM based on VGG-19 architecture (Visual Geometry Group [VGG], Oxford University, Oxford, UK) with a single fully connected 2-classification layer was developed through fine-tuning and validated on all cohorts. Furthermore, we compared the model with 8 endoscopists with varying experience. Primary comparison measures included accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: EGCM acquired AUCs of .808 in the ITC and .813 in the ETC. Moreover, EGCM achieved similar predictive performance as the senior endoscopists (accuracy: .770 vs .755, P = .355; sensitivity: .792 vs .767, P = .183; specificity: .745 vs .742, P = .931) but better than the junior endoscopists (accuracy: .770 vs .728, P < .05). After referring to the results of EGCM, the average diagnostic ability of the endoscopists was significantly improved in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV (P < .05). Conclusions: EGCM exhibited comparable performance with senior endoscopists in the diagnosis of EGC and showed the potential value in aiding and improving the diagnosis of EGC by endoscopists.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85100685841
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.11.014
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.11.014
M3 - 文章
C2 - 33248070
AN - SCOPUS:85100685841
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 93
SP - 1333-1341.e3
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 6
ER -