Defending water treatment networks: Exploiting spatio-temporal effects for cyber attack detection

While Water Treatment Networks (WTNs) are critical infrastructures for local communities and public health, WTNs are vulnerable to cyber attacks. Effective detection of attacks can defend WTNs against discharging contaminated water, denying access, destroying equipment, and causing public fear. While there are extensive studies in WTNs attack detection, they only exploit the data characteristics partially to detect cyber attacks. After preliminary exploring the sensing data of WTNs, we find that integrating spatio-temporal knowledge, representation learning, and detection algorithms can improve attack detection accuracy. To this end, we propose a structured anomaly detection framework to defend WTNs by modeling the spatiotemporal characteristics of cyber attacks in WTNs. In particular, we propose a spatio-temporal representation framework specially tailored to cyber attacks after separating the sensing data of WTNs into a sequence of time segments. This framework has two key components. The first component is a temporal embedding module to preserve temporal patterns within a time segment by projecting the time segment of a sensor into a temporal embedding vector. We then construct Spatio-Temporal Graphs (STGs), where a node is a sensor and an attribute is the temporal embedding vector of the sensor, to describe the state of the WTNs. The second component is a spatial embedding module, which learns the final fused embedding of the WTNs from STGs. In addition, we devise an improved one class-SVM model that utilizes a new designed pairwise kernel to detect cyber attacks. The devised pairwise kernel augments the distance between normal and attack patterns in the fused embedding space. Finally, we conducted extensive experimental evaluations with real-world data to demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework: it achieves an accuracy of 91.65%, with average improvement ratios of 82.78% and 22.96% with respect to F1 and AUC, compared with baseline methods.