TY - JOUR
T1 - CT-based radiomics signature for differentiating Borrmann type IV gastric cancer from primary gastric lymphoma
AU - Ma, Zelan
AU - Fang, Mengjie
AU - Huang, Yanqi
AU - He, Lan
AU - Chen, Xin
AU - Liang, Cuishan
AU - Huang, Xiaomei
AU - Cheng, Zixuan
AU - Dong, Di
AU - Liang, Changhong
AU - Xie, Jiajun
AU - Tian, Jie
AU - Liu, Zaiyi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Purpose To evaluate the value of CT-based radiomics signature for differentiating Borrmann type IV gastric cancer (GC) from primary gastric lymphoma (PGL). Materials and methods 40 patients with Borrmann type IV GC and 30 patients with PGL were retrospectively recruited. 485 radiomics features were extracted and selected from the portal venous CT images to build a radiomics signature. Subjective CT findings, including gastric wall peristalsis, perigastric fat infiltration, lymphadenopathy below the renal hila and enhancement pattern, were assessed to construct a subjective findings model. The radiomics signature, subjective CT findings, age and gender were integrated into a combined model by multivariate analysis. The diagnostic performance of these three models was assessed with receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) and were compared using DeLong test. Results The subjective findings model, the radiomics signature and the combined model showed a diagnostic accuracy of 81.43% (AUC [area under the curve], 0.806; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.696–0.917; sensitivity, 63.33%; specificity, 95.00%), 84.29% (AUC, 0.886 [95% CI: 0.809–0.963]; sensitivity, 86.67%; specificity, 82.50%), 87.14% (AUC, 0.903 [95%CI: 0.831–0.975]; sensitivity, 70.00%; specificity, 100%), respectively. There were no significant differences in AUC among these three models (P = 0.051–0.422). Conclusion Radiomics analysis has the potential to accurately differentiate Borrmann type IV GC from PGL.
AB - Purpose To evaluate the value of CT-based radiomics signature for differentiating Borrmann type IV gastric cancer (GC) from primary gastric lymphoma (PGL). Materials and methods 40 patients with Borrmann type IV GC and 30 patients with PGL were retrospectively recruited. 485 radiomics features were extracted and selected from the portal venous CT images to build a radiomics signature. Subjective CT findings, including gastric wall peristalsis, perigastric fat infiltration, lymphadenopathy below the renal hila and enhancement pattern, were assessed to construct a subjective findings model. The radiomics signature, subjective CT findings, age and gender were integrated into a combined model by multivariate analysis. The diagnostic performance of these three models was assessed with receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) and were compared using DeLong test. Results The subjective findings model, the radiomics signature and the combined model showed a diagnostic accuracy of 81.43% (AUC [area under the curve], 0.806; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.696–0.917; sensitivity, 63.33%; specificity, 95.00%), 84.29% (AUC, 0.886 [95% CI: 0.809–0.963]; sensitivity, 86.67%; specificity, 82.50%), 87.14% (AUC, 0.903 [95%CI: 0.831–0.975]; sensitivity, 70.00%; specificity, 100%), respectively. There were no significant differences in AUC among these three models (P = 0.051–0.422). Conclusion Radiomics analysis has the potential to accurately differentiate Borrmann type IV GC from PGL.
KW - Borrmann type IV gastric cancer
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Primary gastric lymphoma
KW - Radiomics signature
KW - Subjective CT findings
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85018501459
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.04.007
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.04.007
M3 - 文章
C2 - 28629560
AN - SCOPUS:85018501459
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 91
SP - 142
EP - 147
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
ER -