TY - GEN
T1 - Cross-trees for stereo matching with priors
AU - Cheng, Feiyang
AU - Zhang, Hong
AU - Sun, Mingui
AU - Wang, Helong
AU - Yuan, Ding
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 IEEE.
PY - 2014/12/4
Y1 - 2014/12/4
N2 - We propose a cross-trees structure to perform the non-local cost aggregation for dense stereo matching. The cross-trees structure consists of a horizontal-tree and a vertical-tree. Compared to other spanning trees, the significant superiority of the cross-trees is that the trees' constructions are efficient and independent on any local or global property. Moreover, the trees are exactly unique. By traversing the two crossed trees successively, a fast non-local cost aggregation algorithm is performed to filter the matching cost volume and then the disparity maps are established with the Winner-Take-All (WTA) strategy. Additionally, two different priors: edge prior and super pixel prior, are proposed to tackle the false smoothing at the depth boundaries. Hence, our method contains two different algorithms in terms of the cross-trees prior in this paper. Performance evaluation on the 27 Middlebury data sets shows that both our algorithms outperform the other two tree-based methods, namely minimum spanning tree (MST) and segment-tree (ST). By performing the non-local cost aggregation on different trees, MST, ST and our method all have competitive rankings on the Middlebury website compared to the local cost aggregation methods.
AB - We propose a cross-trees structure to perform the non-local cost aggregation for dense stereo matching. The cross-trees structure consists of a horizontal-tree and a vertical-tree. Compared to other spanning trees, the significant superiority of the cross-trees is that the trees' constructions are efficient and independent on any local or global property. Moreover, the trees are exactly unique. By traversing the two crossed trees successively, a fast non-local cost aggregation algorithm is performed to filter the matching cost volume and then the disparity maps are established with the Winner-Take-All (WTA) strategy. Additionally, two different priors: edge prior and super pixel prior, are proposed to tackle the false smoothing at the depth boundaries. Hence, our method contains two different algorithms in terms of the cross-trees prior in this paper. Performance evaluation on the 27 Middlebury data sets shows that both our algorithms outperform the other two tree-based methods, namely minimum spanning tree (MST) and segment-tree (ST). By performing the non-local cost aggregation on different trees, MST, ST and our method all have competitive rankings on the Middlebury website compared to the local cost aggregation methods.
KW - Cost aggregation
KW - Image filtering
KW - Spanning trees
KW - Stereo matching
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84919949260
U2 - 10.1109/ICPR.2014.45
DO - 10.1109/ICPR.2014.45
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:84919949260
T3 - Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition
SP - 208
EP - 213
BT - 2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2014
Y2 - 24 August 2014 through 28 August 2014
ER -