TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptual modeling of training and organizational risk dynamics
AU - Yi, Lu
AU - Marais, Karen B.
AU - Zhang, Shu Guang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Training is an essential component of ensuring safe operations. Here we consider the relationship between training and organizational risk and create a conceptual model illustrating how risk is decreased by training, and how a lack of training increases risk. We construct our model by combining insights from the literature on training, both at the individual and organizational levels, with insights from the literature on accident causation. We represent risk as a combination of the probability and consequences of accidents, and training as combination of topic coverage (depth and breadth), organization coverage (how much of the organization is exposed to training), and frequency (how often it occurs). Our model incorporates several critical aspects of the relationship between training and risk. First, it captures path dependence-that is, risk does not follow the same curve when training is increased as when training is decreased. Second, and building on the first point, risk lags changes in training. When training is decreased, risk does not immediately increase, and, conversely, when training is increased, risk does not immediately decrease. This time lag can contribute to training being cut when resources are tight, or to training being seen as ineffective. Third, we consider how the characteristics of a particular organization affect the risk-training curve and demonstrate how the curve can be tailored for a particular organization.
AB - Training is an essential component of ensuring safe operations. Here we consider the relationship between training and organizational risk and create a conceptual model illustrating how risk is decreased by training, and how a lack of training increases risk. We construct our model by combining insights from the literature on training, both at the individual and organizational levels, with insights from the literature on accident causation. We represent risk as a combination of the probability and consequences of accidents, and training as combination of topic coverage (depth and breadth), organization coverage (how much of the organization is exposed to training), and frequency (how often it occurs). Our model incorporates several critical aspects of the relationship between training and risk. First, it captures path dependence-that is, risk does not follow the same curve when training is increased as when training is decreased. Second, and building on the first point, risk lags changes in training. When training is decreased, risk does not immediately increase, and, conversely, when training is increased, risk does not immediately decrease. This time lag can contribute to training being cut when resources are tight, or to training being seen as ineffective. Third, we consider how the characteristics of a particular organization affect the risk-training curve and demonstrate how the curve can be tailored for a particular organization.
KW - Accident
KW - Employee performance
KW - Organizational knowledge
KW - Organizational risk
KW - Skills and attitudes
KW - Training
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84949123338
U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.09.090
DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.09.090
M3 - 会议文章
AN - SCOPUS:84949123338
SN - 1877-7058
VL - 80
SP - 313
EP - 328
JO - Procedia Engineering
JF - Procedia Engineering
T2 - 3rd International Symposium on Aircraft Airworthiness, ISAA 2013
Y2 - 19 November 2013 through 21 November 2013
ER -