跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Comparison of linear and nonlinear active disturbance rejection control method for hypersonic vehicle

  • Beihang University
  • University of Strathclyde

科研成果: 书/报告/会议事项章节会议稿件同行评审

摘要

Near space hypersonic vehicles have features of strong coupling, nonlinearity and acute changes in aerodynamic parameters, which are challenging for the controller design. Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) method does not depend on the accurate system model and has strong robustness against disturbances. This paper discusses the differences between the fractional-order PID (FOPIλDμ) ADRC method and the FOPIλDμ LADRC method for hypersonic vehicles. The FOPIλDμ ADRC controller in this paper consists of a tracking-differentiator (TD), a FOPIλDμ controller and an extended state observer (ESO).The FOPIλDμ LADRC controller consists of the same TD and FOPIλDμ controller with the FOPIλDμ ADRC controller and a linear extended state observer (LESO) instead of ESO. The stability of LESO and the FOPIλDμ LADRC method is detailed analyzed. Simulation results show that the FOPIλDμ ADRC method can make the hypersonic vehicle nonlinear model track desired nominal signals faster and has stronger robustness against external environmental disturbances than the FOPIλDμ LADRC method.

源语言英语
主期刊名Proceedings of the 35th Chinese Control Conference, CCC 2016
编辑Jie Chen, Qianchuan Zhao, Jie Chen
出版商IEEE Computer Society
10759-10764
页数6
ISBN(电子版)9789881563910
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 26 8月 2016
活动35th Chinese Control Conference, CCC 2016 - Chengdu, 中国
期限: 27 7月 201629 7月 2016

出版系列

姓名Chinese Control Conference, CCC
2016-August
ISSN(印刷版)1934-1768
ISSN(电子版)2161-2927

会议

会议35th Chinese Control Conference, CCC 2016
国家/地区中国
Chengdu
时期27/07/1629/07/16

指纹

探究 'Comparison of linear and nonlinear active disturbance rejection control method for hypersonic vehicle' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此