TY - JOUR
T1 - A study on the behaviour of high-order flux reconstruction method with different low-dissipation numerical fluxes for large eddy simulation
AU - Boxi, Lin
AU - Chao, Yan
AU - Shusheng, Chen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/10/21
Y1 - 2017/10/21
N2 - This work focuses on the numerical dissipation features of high-order flux reconstruction (FR) method combined with different numerical fluxes in turbulence flows. The famous Roe and AUSM+ numerical fluxes together with their corresponding low-dissipation enhanced versions (LMRoe, SLAU2) and higher resolution variants (HR-LMRoe, HR-SLAU2) are incorporated into FR framework, and the dissipation interplay of these combinations is investigated in implicit large eddy simulation. The numerical dissipation stemming from these convective numerical fluxes is quantified by simulating the inviscid Gresho vortex, the transitional Taylor–Green vortex and the homogenous decaying isotropic turbulence. The results suggest that low-dissipation enhanced versions are preferential both in high-order and low-order cases to their original forms, while the use of HR-SLAU2 has marginal improvements and the HR-LMRoe leads to degenerated solution with high-order. In high-order the effects of numerical fluxes are reduced, and their viscosity may not be dissipative enough to provide physically consistent turbulence when under-resolved.
AB - This work focuses on the numerical dissipation features of high-order flux reconstruction (FR) method combined with different numerical fluxes in turbulence flows. The famous Roe and AUSM+ numerical fluxes together with their corresponding low-dissipation enhanced versions (LMRoe, SLAU2) and higher resolution variants (HR-LMRoe, HR-SLAU2) are incorporated into FR framework, and the dissipation interplay of these combinations is investigated in implicit large eddy simulation. The numerical dissipation stemming from these convective numerical fluxes is quantified by simulating the inviscid Gresho vortex, the transitional Taylor–Green vortex and the homogenous decaying isotropic turbulence. The results suggest that low-dissipation enhanced versions are preferential both in high-order and low-order cases to their original forms, while the use of HR-SLAU2 has marginal improvements and the HR-LMRoe leads to degenerated solution with high-order. In high-order the effects of numerical fluxes are reduced, and their viscosity may not be dissipative enough to provide physically consistent turbulence when under-resolved.
KW - Flux reconstruction/ correction procedure via reconstruction (FR/CPR)
KW - Riemann solver
KW - computational fluid dynamics
KW - large-eddy simulation
KW - numerical dissipation
KW - numerical flux
KW - turbulent flow
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85031781111
U2 - 10.1080/10618562.2017.1385778
DO - 10.1080/10618562.2017.1385778
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85031781111
SN - 1061-8562
VL - 31
SP - 339
EP - 361
JO - International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics
JF - International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics
IS - 9
ER -