TY - GEN
T1 - Trust Enhancement Issues in Program Repair
AU - Noller, Yannic
AU - Shariffdeen, Ridwan
AU - Gao, Xiang
AU - Roychoudhury, Abhik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 ACM.
PY - 2022/7/5
Y1 - 2022/7/5
N2 - Automated program repair is an emerging technology that seeks to automatically rectify bugs and vulnerabilities using learning, search, and semantic analysis. Trust in automatically generated patches is necessary for achieving greater adoption of program repair. Towards this goal, we survey more than 100 software practitioners to understand the artifacts and setups needed to enhance trust in automatically generated patches. Based on the feedback from the survey on developer preferences, we quantitatively evaluate existing test-suite based program repair tools. We find that they cannot produce high-quality patches within a top-10 ranking and an acceptable time period of 1 hour. The developer feedback from our qualitative study and the observations from our quantitative examination of existing repair tools point to actionable insights to drive program repair research. Specifically, we note that producing repairs within an acceptable time-bound is very much dependent on leveraging an abstract search space representation of a rich enough search space. Moreover, while additional developer inputs are valuable for generating or ranking patches, developers do not seem to be interested in a significant human-in-the-loop interaction.
AB - Automated program repair is an emerging technology that seeks to automatically rectify bugs and vulnerabilities using learning, search, and semantic analysis. Trust in automatically generated patches is necessary for achieving greater adoption of program repair. Towards this goal, we survey more than 100 software practitioners to understand the artifacts and setups needed to enhance trust in automatically generated patches. Based on the feedback from the survey on developer preferences, we quantitatively evaluate existing test-suite based program repair tools. We find that they cannot produce high-quality patches within a top-10 ranking and an acceptable time period of 1 hour. The developer feedback from our qualitative study and the observations from our quantitative examination of existing repair tools point to actionable insights to drive program repair research. Specifically, we note that producing repairs within an acceptable time-bound is very much dependent on leveraging an abstract search space representation of a rich enough search space. Moreover, while additional developer inputs are valuable for generating or ranking patches, developers do not seem to be interested in a significant human-in-the-loop interaction.
KW - program repair
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85128307551
U2 - 10.1145/3510003.3510040
DO - 10.1145/3510003.3510040
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85128307551
T3 - Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering
SP - 2228
EP - 2240
BT - Proceedings - 2022 ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2022
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 44th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2022
Y2 - 22 May 2022 through 27 May 2022
ER -