Abstract
This article examines a few Talmyan claims (Talmy 2000: 471) about the morphosyntactic features of agency in causal situations. Talmy proposes a basic agentive construction SR RESULTed FROM Sa as well as a distinction between Agent and Author for the semantic organization of agency. Narratives were elicited from a set of 20 video clips of real situations; 50 native speakers of Mandarin Chinese were interviewed to set up a closed corpus of 1000 agentive causal sentences. They indicate that Talmy's claims about agency can be supported, while his claims about the syntactic structures cannot. This article further proposes a causal model for the semantic organization of agency. It is concluded that there does not exist a universal pattern for representing agentive situations, and the semantic structure of agency can be determined using the causal model of agency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Change of Paradigms - New Paradoxes |
| Subtitle of host publication | Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics |
| Publisher | de Gruyter |
| Pages | 169-188 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783110435597 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783110441345 |
| State | Published - 16 Oct 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The linguistic representations of agency in causal chains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver