Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sub-barrier fusion of Si+Si systems: Does the deformation of 28Si play a role?

  • G. Colucci
  • , G. Montagnoli
  • , M. Faggian
  • , A. Goasduff
  • , M. Mazzocco
  • , F. Scarlassara
  • , C. Stefanini
  • , E. Strano
  • , M. Urbani
  • , A. M. Stefanini
  • , L. Corradi
  • , E. Fioretto
  • , F. Galtarossa
  • , G. L. Zhang
  • , D. Bourgin
  • , S. Courtin
  • , F. Haas
  • , P. Colovic
  • , S. Szilner
  • University of Padua
  • Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro
  • Université de Strasbourg
  • Ruder Boskovic Institute
  • University of Ferrara

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

This contribution reports on the results of measurements of near- and sub-barrier fusion cross sections in the system 30Si+30Si performed at the Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro of INFN. The 30Si beam of the XTU Tandem accelerator in the energy range of 47-90 MeV, was delivered on a metallic 30Si target (50 μg/cm2) enriched to 99.64 % in mass 30. A beam electrostatic deflector was used for the detection of evaporation residues. The excitation function obtained for 30Si+30Si has been compared with the previous data on 28Si+28Si and Coupled Channels (CC) calculations using the M3Y+repulsion potential, taking into account the low lying 2+ 3- excitations. Reproducing the low-energy 28Si+28Si excitation function was only possible by using a weak imaginary potential, probably simulating the oblate deformation of this nucleus. On the contrary, the data on 30Si+30Si are nicely reproduced by the CC calculations without any imaginary potential (30Si has a spherical shape). The astrophysical S-factor does not show a maximum, so that there is no evidence for hindrance in the measured energy range. The logarithmic derivative of the two excitation functions highlights the difference between the two systems. Even above the barrier the two systems behave differently. This is best seen by comparing the two barrier distributions where the high energy peak observed for 28Si+28Si is not found for 30Si+30Si. This is presumably due to the stronger couplings present in 28Si and further theoretical analyses are in progress.

Original languageEnglish
Article number220
JournalProceedings of Science
Volume2016-September
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes
Event26th International Nuclear Physics Conference, INPC 2016 - Adelaide, Australia
Duration: 11 Sep 201616 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sub-barrier fusion of Si+Si systems: Does the deformation of 28Si play a role?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this