Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reducing Uncertainty of Schema Matching via Crowdsourcing with Accuracy Rates

  • Chen Jason Zhang
  • , Lei Chen
  • , H. V. Jagadish
  • , Mengchen Zhang*
  • , Yongxin Tong
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Shandong University of Finance and Economics
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Schema matching is a central challenge for data integration systems. Inspired by the popularity and the success of crowdsourcing platforms, we explore the use of crowdsourcing to reduce the uncertainty of schema matching. Since crowdsourcing platforms are most effective for simple questions, we assume that each Correspondence Correctness Question (CCQ) asks the crowd to decide whether a given correspondence should exist in the correct matching. Furthermore, members of a crowd may sometimes return incorrect answers with different probabilities. Accuracy rates of individual crowd workers can be attributes of CCQs as well as evaluations of individual workers. We prove that uncertainty reduction equals to entropy of answers minus entropy of crowds and show how to obtain lower and upper bounds for it. We propose frameworks and efficient algorithms to dynamically manage the CCQs to maximize the uncertainty reduction within a limited budget of questions. We develop two novel approaches, namely 'Single CCQ' and 'Multiple CCQ', which adaptively select, publish, and manage questions. We verify the value of our solutions with simulation and real implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8533346
Pages (from-to)135-151
Number of pages17
JournalIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2020

Keywords

  • crowdsourcing
  • schema matching
  • uncertainty reduction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reducing Uncertainty of Schema Matching via Crowdsourcing with Accuracy Rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this