Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance shaping factors in the human error probability modification of human reliability analysis

  • Xing Pan
  • , Zekun Wu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Human-induced accidents indicate the importance of human reliability analysis (HRA) in reducing and eliminating human errors, thus improving the reliability of human–machine systems. HRA takes both qualitative and quantitative approaches to determine the error of the operators and the contexts in which tasks are performed. To ensure that HRA results can objectively evaluate human error behaviors, the quantification of human error probability (HEP) is typically based on the qualitative analysis of human factors and task contexts and is further refined by performance shaping factors (PSFs). A good HEP process development includes the selection of PSFs, the evaluation of PSFs and the quantification strategy of HEP. A variety of HEP quantification analyses based on PSFs has been widely adopted in contemporary HRA studies. This work reviews three major quantification strategies used in HRA methods. Additionally, we generalize the modification of HEP with PSFs into a paradigm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)538-550
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jul 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • human error probability
  • human reliability analysis
  • performance shaping factors
  • task context

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance shaping factors in the human error probability modification of human reliability analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this