Abstract
The aim of noisy phase retrieval is to estimate a signal x0∈Cd from m noisy intensity measurements bj=|〈aj,x0〉|2+ηj,j=1,…,m, where aj∈Cd are known measurement vectors and η=(η1,…,ηm)⊤∈Rm is a noise vector. A commonly used estimator for x0 is to minimize the intensity-based loss function, i.e., xˆ:=argminx∈Cd∑j=1m(|〈aj,x〉|2−bj)2. Although many algorithms for solving the intensity-based estimator have been developed, there are very few results about its estimation performance. In this paper, we focus on the performance of the intensity-based estimator and prove that the error bound satisfies [Formula presented] under the assumption of m≳d and aj∈Cd,j=1,…,m, being complex Gaussian random vectors. We also show that the error bound is rate optimal when m≳dlogm. In the case where x0 is an s-sparse signal, we present a similar result under the assumption of m≳slog(ed/s). To the best of our knowledge, our results provide the first theoretical guarantees for both the intensity-based estimator and its sparse version.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101584 |
| Journal | Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis |
| Volume | 68 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2024 |
Keywords
- Estimation performance
- Intensity-based model
- Phase retrieval
- Sparse signals
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Performance bounds of the intensity-based estimators for noisy phase retrieval'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver