TY - GEN
T1 - Optimistic Asynchronous Dynamic-Committee Proactive Secret Sharing
AU - Hu, Bin
AU - Liu, Jianwei
AU - Lu, Zhenliang
AU - Tang, Qiang
AU - Xiang, Zhuolun
AU - Zhang, Zongyang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 IEEE.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Dynamic-committee Proactive Secret Sharing (DPSS) has gained increased attention for its ability to dynamically update the shareholder committees and refresh secret shares, even against adversaries that gradually corrupt all nodes. However, existing state-of-the-art asynchronous DPSS protocols suffer from significant O(n3) message complexity and O(λn3) communication complexity, where λ denotes the security parameter and n is the committee size. In this paper, we distinguish optimistic-case and worstcase scenarios based on node behaviors and network conditions, thus reducing the redundant communication overhead of asynchronous DPSS. Under the trusted setup assumption, we achieved an O(n2) message complexity in all scenarios. Additionally, our protocol has an O(λn2) communication complexity in the optimistic case, where all nodes are honest and the network is synchronous, and O(λ n3) communication complexity in the worst case. We also propose two strategies to eliminate the strong trusted setup assumptions, and the asymptotic performance still surpasses the state-of-the-art protocols. For committee sizes of 4 to 400, the estimated concrete communication cost of our DPSS is 19-100x (resp., 8-14x) smaller in the optimistic case (resp., worst case) compared to LongLive (USENIX Security '23). Experiments in AWS show that our DPSS achieves a latency of 1.9-8 seconds for committee sizes from 4 to 64. Single-machine benchmarks reveal a (computational) runtime reduction of up to 44 %.
AB - Dynamic-committee Proactive Secret Sharing (DPSS) has gained increased attention for its ability to dynamically update the shareholder committees and refresh secret shares, even against adversaries that gradually corrupt all nodes. However, existing state-of-the-art asynchronous DPSS protocols suffer from significant O(n3) message complexity and O(λn3) communication complexity, where λ denotes the security parameter and n is the committee size. In this paper, we distinguish optimistic-case and worstcase scenarios based on node behaviors and network conditions, thus reducing the redundant communication overhead of asynchronous DPSS. Under the trusted setup assumption, we achieved an O(n2) message complexity in all scenarios. Additionally, our protocol has an O(λn2) communication complexity in the optimistic case, where all nodes are honest and the network is synchronous, and O(λ n3) communication complexity in the worst case. We also propose two strategies to eliminate the strong trusted setup assumptions, and the asymptotic performance still surpasses the state-of-the-art protocols. For committee sizes of 4 to 400, the estimated concrete communication cost of our DPSS is 19-100x (resp., 8-14x) smaller in the optimistic case (resp., worst case) compared to LongLive (USENIX Security '23). Experiments in AWS show that our DPSS achieves a latency of 1.9-8 seconds for committee sizes from 4 to 64. Single-machine benchmarks reveal a (computational) runtime reduction of up to 44 %.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105044402201
U2 - 10.1109/SP63933.2026.00243
DO - 10.1109/SP63933.2026.00243
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:105044402201
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
SP - 3204
EP - 3222
BT - Proceedings - 47th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2026
A2 - Oprea, Alina
A2 - Nita-Rotaru, Cristina
A2 - Papernot, Nicolas
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 47th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2026
Y2 - 18 May 2026 through 21 May 2026
ER -