Abstract
Bourbaki, Birkhoff-Pierce and Fuchs pointed out or showed that a lattice-ordered field in which each square is positive must be totally ordered. Yang proved that a lattice-ordered ring R is a totally ordered skew-field if and only if every strictly positive element of R is invertible and each square in R is positive. In this note, we construct a simple example to explain the difference between order-isomorphisms and lattice-isomorphisms, and show that the difference can be dropped in lattice-ordered rings. Especially, this yields an extension and an elementary proof of the main theorem in Yang's paper.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 417-420 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Algebra Colloquium |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2013 |
Keywords
- Division-closed
- Lattice-ordered ring
- Positive square
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Note on lattice-ordered rings with positive squares'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver