New insights into changes in ocular structural parameters in simulated hypobaric hypoxia

  • Yuchen Wang
  • , Anqi Guo
  • , Xinli Yu
  • , Yihe Liu
  • , Zesong Wang
  • , Jiaxing Xie
  • , Xinzuo Zhou
  • , Siru Liu
  • , Jiaxi Li
  • , Chengkai Zhou
  • , Yuanhong Li
  • , Chao Sun
  • , Jing Zhang
  • , Ziyuan Liu
  • , Xuemin Li*
  • , Li Ding
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose High altitude is the main area for human exploration, and human eye is an important organ for obtaining visual signals. The changes of ocular structural parameters in a simulated hypobaric hypoxia environment need to be clarified. Methods Measurements were taken at five altitudes ((1) ground, (2) 3500 m, (3) 4000 m, (4) 4500 m and (5) ground). Refractive values were measured with the IOL Master (Carl Zeiss Shanghai Co. Ltd.). Data analysis was performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test, paired sample T-test and Wilcoxon test. Results Subjects' axial length (AL) increased with altitude, peaking at 4500 m, then decreased. Significant AL differences were observed across altitudes (p<0.05), except between 2-5 and 3-5. Central corneal thickness (CCT) thickened then thinned with elevation changes, significantly thicker at altitudes 2-5 compared with the baseline (p<0.05). Lens thickness (LT) followed a similar pattern, increasing up to altitude 4, then decreasing at 5. Correlations were found between AL and LT at altitudes 1 (r=0.375, p<0.05) and 5 (r=0.341, p<0.05), and between AL and CCT at altitude 4 (r=0.337, p<0.05), but not elsewhere. Conclusions As altitude increases and acute low-pressure hypoxia worsens, changes in AL, CCT and LT may affect pilots' visual function, information acquisition, decision-making and flight safety.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere001928
JournalBMJ Open Ophthalmology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 27 Feb 2025
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'New insights into changes in ocular structural parameters in simulated hypobaric hypoxia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this