Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Named entity recognition of follow-up and time information in 20 000 radiology reports

  • Yan Xu
  • , Junichi Tsujii
  • , Eric I.Chao Chang*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Microsoft USA

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Objective To develop a system to extract follow-up information from radiology reports. The method may be used as a component in a system which automatically generates follow-up information in a timely fashion. Methods A novel method of combining an LSP (labeled sequential pattern) classifier with a CRF (conditional random field) recognizer was devised. The LSP classifier filters out irrelevant sentences, while the CRF recognizer extracts follow-up and time phrases from candidate sentences presented by the LSP classifier. Measurements The standard performance metrics of precision (P), recall (R), and F measure (F) in the exact and inexact matching settings were used for evaluation. Results Four experiments conducted using 20 000 radiology reports showed that the CRF recognizer achieved high performance without time-consuming feature engineering and that the LSP classifier further improved the performance of the CRF recognizer. The performance of the current system is P=0.90, R=0.86, F=0.88 in the exact matching setting and P=0.98, R=0.93, F=0.95 in the inexact matching setting. Conclusion The experiments demonstrate that the system performs far better than a baseline rule-based system and is worth considering for deployment trials in an alert generation system. The LSP classifier successfully compensated for the inherent weakness of CRF, that is, its inability to use global information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)792-799
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Named entity recognition of follow-up and time information in 20 000 radiology reports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this