Multi-Surrogate Collaboration Approach for Creep-Fatigue Reliability Assessment of Turbine Rotor

  • Lu Kai Song*
  • , Guang Chen Bai
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The creep-fatigue resistance of turbine rotor seriously affects the reliability performance and service lifetime of aircraft engine. Creep-fatigue reliability assessment is an effective measure to quantify the uncertain creep-fatigue damage and evaluate the creep-fatigue reliable life for turbine rotor. To improve the modeling accuracy and simulation efficiency of creep-fatigue reliability assessment, a multi-surrogate collaboration approach (MSCA) is proposed by absorbing the strengths of the proposed dynamic neural network surrogate (DNNS) into distributed collaborative strategy. The creep-fatigue reliability assessment of a typical turbine rotor is regarded as one case to estimate the presented MSCA with respect to the fluctuations of multi-physical variables and the variabilities of multi-model parameters. The assessment results reveal that the creep-fatigue reliable life of turbine rotor under reliability degree of 0.998 7 is 629 cycles, and the fatigue strength coefficient and holding creep time play a leading role on creep-fatigue reliable life since their effect probabilities of 27 % and 19 %, respectively. Comparison of various methods (direct Monte Carlo simulation, response surface, neural network surrogate, DNNS) shows that the presented MSCA holds high efficiency and accuracy in creep-fatigue reliability assessment of turbine rotor.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9004569
Pages (from-to)39861-39874
Number of pages14
JournalIEEE Access
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Creep-fatigue life
  • neural network
  • reliability assessment
  • surrogate model
  • turbine rotor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-Surrogate Collaboration Approach for Creep-Fatigue Reliability Assessment of Turbine Rotor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this