Liquidity shocks, security design and organizational change

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper studies how a firm can optimally resolve financial distress ex post. We model a firm hit by a liquidity shock and requiring an additional liquidity injection to continue its operations. We find that, in the case of a small shock, the firm should withstand the shock through debt renegotiation. In the case of a medium shock, the firm should withstand the shock through mergers and acquisitions. In this case, financial restructuring must be simultaneously designed to preserve the incentives of the manager and induce the investors to provide liquidity. The debt holders must forgo part of their original holdings and share with the liquidity providers through a combination of debt and equity. The manager must hold equity or options. In the case of a large shock, the firm should be liquidated. This paper provides the first study on how a firm simultaneously seeks an acquisition and restructures its financial claims to resolve financial distress, and also adds to the literature by showing that the optimal resolution policies depend on the level of adverse shocks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-180
Number of pages14
JournalRevue Economique
Volume70
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Liquidity shocks, security design and organizational change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this