Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Identifying early gastric cancer under magnifying narrow-band images with deep learning: a multicenter study

  • Hao Hu
  • , Lixin Gong
  • , Di Dong
  • , Liang Zhu
  • , Min Wang
  • , Jie He
  • , Lei Shu
  • , Yiling Cai
  • , Shilun Cai
  • , Wei Su
  • , Yunshi Zhong
  • , Cong Li
  • , Yongbei Zhu
  • , Mengjie Fang
  • , Lianzhen Zhong
  • , Xin Yang
  • , Pinghong Zhou*
  • , Jie Tian*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Fudan University
  • Northeastern University China
  • CAS - Institute of Automation
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • No. 1 Hospital of Wuhan
  • The Affiliated Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University
  • Beihang University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Aims: Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy (ME-NBI) has shown advantages in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, proficiency in diagnostic algorithms requires substantial expertise and experience. In this study, we aimed to develop a computer-aided diagnostic model for EGM (EGCM) to analyze and assist in the diagnosis of EGC under ME-NBI. Methods: A total of 1777 ME-NBI images from 295 cases were collected from 3 centers. These cases were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 170), an internal test cohort (ITC, n = 73), and an external test cohort (ETC, n = 52). EGCM based on VGG-19 architecture (Visual Geometry Group [VGG], Oxford University, Oxford, UK) with a single fully connected 2-classification layer was developed through fine-tuning and validated on all cohorts. Furthermore, we compared the model with 8 endoscopists with varying experience. Primary comparison measures included accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: EGCM acquired AUCs of .808 in the ITC and .813 in the ETC. Moreover, EGCM achieved similar predictive performance as the senior endoscopists (accuracy: .770 vs .755, P = .355; sensitivity: .792 vs .767, P = .183; specificity: .745 vs .742, P = .931) but better than the junior endoscopists (accuracy: .770 vs .728, P < .05). After referring to the results of EGCM, the average diagnostic ability of the endoscopists was significantly improved in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV (P < .05). Conclusions: EGCM exhibited comparable performance with senior endoscopists in the diagnosis of EGC and showed the potential value in aiding and improving the diagnosis of EGC by endoscopists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1333-1341.e3
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying early gastric cancer under magnifying narrow-band images with deep learning: a multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this