TY - GEN
T1 - Finite element analysis of acetabular transverse fracture reconstruction treated with different internal fixation methods
AU - Pei, Baoqing
AU - Mu, Jiao
AU - Li, Hui
AU - Li, Deyu
AU - Wang, Yuhai
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This article established the pelvis models with aeolotropic material property, and made modeling and mechanical analysis of the acetabular transverse fracture models treated with different internal fixation methods. The mechanical indexes we interested in are as follows, the maximal displacement, the maximum equivalent stress and the maximum stress around the fracture line. Through the compare of these indexes, we found the biomechanical properties differences of the two groups of fixation methods. The first group is including the posterior column long plate (NPL) and the posterior column short plate (NPS) fixations. The second group is composed of the following three double-column fixation methods, the double-column lag screws (SSG), the anterior column lag screw and posterior plate (SPG) fixation and the double-column plates (PPG) methods. All these analyses are during the double-leg stand position. The conclusions are as follows: NPL is much better than NPS. SSG is better than SPG, while SPG is better than PPG.
AB - This article established the pelvis models with aeolotropic material property, and made modeling and mechanical analysis of the acetabular transverse fracture models treated with different internal fixation methods. The mechanical indexes we interested in are as follows, the maximal displacement, the maximum equivalent stress and the maximum stress around the fracture line. Through the compare of these indexes, we found the biomechanical properties differences of the two groups of fixation methods. The first group is including the posterior column long plate (NPL) and the posterior column short plate (NPS) fixations. The second group is composed of the following three double-column fixation methods, the double-column lag screws (SSG), the anterior column lag screw and posterior plate (SPG) fixation and the double-column plates (PPG) methods. All these analyses are during the double-leg stand position. The conclusions are as follows: NPL is much better than NPS. SSG is better than SPG, while SPG is better than PPG.
KW - Acetabulum
KW - Aeolotropic material model
KW - Finite element modeling analysis
KW - Internal fixation
KW - Transverse fracture
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84880221605
U2 - 10.1109/ICOIP.2010.285
DO - 10.1109/ICOIP.2010.285
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:84880221605
SN - 9780769542522
T3 - Proceedings - 2010 International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing, ICOIP 2010
SP - 557
EP - 560
BT - Proceedings - 2010 International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing, ICOIP 2010
T2 - 2010 International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing, ICOIP 2010
Y2 - 11 November 2010 through 12 November 2010
ER -