TY - GEN
T1 - Credibility evaluation of simulation models using group analytic hierarchy process based on priority probability conversion
AU - Yang, Gengjiao
AU - Laili, Yuanjun
AU - Zhang, Lin
AU - Hu, Xiaolin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The credibility evaluation of models has attracted extensive attention in Modeling and Simulation (M&S). With increasingly complex models, multiple domain experts are required to jointly assess the credibility of a model. Group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) is a method by many experts to make decision. In GAHP, the preference aggregation of group members is a critical procedure. However, the impact of expert number and indicator priority order on the evaluation results has not been well considered in previous preference aggregation procedure yet. In this paper, we first propose a novel preference aggregation procedure, priority probability conversion (PPC), to enhance the effectiveness of GAHP, named PPC-GAHP. Then, we introduce a commonly used evaluation criteria for such procedures. Finally, a numerical example is provided to elucidate the details of the proposed procedure and is compared with other aggregation procedures in GAHP to further demonstrate its validity.
AB - The credibility evaluation of models has attracted extensive attention in Modeling and Simulation (M&S). With increasingly complex models, multiple domain experts are required to jointly assess the credibility of a model. Group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) is a method by many experts to make decision. In GAHP, the preference aggregation of group members is a critical procedure. However, the impact of expert number and indicator priority order on the evaluation results has not been well considered in previous preference aggregation procedure yet. In this paper, we first propose a novel preference aggregation procedure, priority probability conversion (PPC), to enhance the effectiveness of GAHP, named PPC-GAHP. Then, we introduce a commonly used evaluation criteria for such procedures. Finally, a numerical example is provided to elucidate the details of the proposed procedure and is compared with other aggregation procedures in GAHP to further demonstrate its validity.
KW - Group analytic hierarchy process
KW - Model credibility evaluation
KW - Preference aggregation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84988851076
U2 - 10.1007/978-981-10-2672-0_52
DO - 10.1007/978-981-10-2672-0_52
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:84988851076
SN - 9789811026713
T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science
SP - 508
EP - 515
BT - Theory, Methodology, Tools and Applications for Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems - 16th Asia Simulation Conference and SCS Autumn Simulation Multi-Conference, AsiaSim/SCS AutumnSim 2016, Proceedings
A2 - Zhang, Lin
A2 - Song, Xiao
A2 - Wu, Yunjie
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 16th Asia Simulation Conference and SCS Autumn Simulation Multi-Conference, AsiaSim/SCS AutumnSim 2016
Y2 - 8 October 2016 through 11 October 2016
ER -