Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Corrigendum to “Performance test of the electromagnetic particle detectors for the LHAASO experiment” [Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1001 (2021) 165193] (Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A (2021) 1001, (S0168900221001777), (10.1016/j.nima.2021.165193))

  • LHAASO Collaboration
  • Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
  • Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics
  • University of Science and Technology of China
  • University of Science and Technology of China
  • Southwest Jiaotong University
  • Sichuan University
  • CAS - Institute of High Energy Physics
  • TIANFU Cosmic Ray Research Center
  • Nanjing University
  • Guangzhou University
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Wuhan University
  • CAS - Purple Mountain Observatory
  • Hebei Normal University
  • CAS - Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  • Tibet University
  • CAS - National Astronomical Observatories
  • Sun Yat-Sen University
  • Yunnan University
  • University of Geneva
  • University of Naples Federico II
  • Shandong University
  • Tsinghua University
  • Zhengzhou University
  • Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Yantai University
  • Peking University
  • Guangxi University
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Mahidol University
  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
  • CAS - National Space Science Center

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The authors regret < (1) In the abstract: “[Formula presented] charge resolution for single particle of 18.5% and [Formula presented]” change to “[Formula presented]charge resolution for single particle of 22.2% and [Formula presented]” (2) Fig. 11 shows distribution of charge resolution of 4362EDs, this figure should be replaced with the followed figure. [Figure presented] (3) In the conclusion: “The charge resolution for single-track events of all tested EDs is about 18.5%”. – change to – “The charge resolution for single-track events of all tested EDs is about 22.2%”. >. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused. We are sorry that there is a mistake in the paper of “Performance test of the electromagnetic particle detectors for the LHAASO experiment”. That is the figure 11 was submitted by mistake. During the ED's performance test, the definition of charge resolution of single particle developed a little bit which brought confusions. In the beginning, we define [Formula presented], where MPV is the maximum of the fitted function. Then we use [Formula presented], however it is relate to the range of spectrum. Finally, we use [Formula presented], where, [Formula presented] using a Gaussian approximation in the paper. Figures of the charge resolution with these definitions were stored in the same directory. Thus, a wrong figure was uploaded during the paper submission. We are very sorry that our negligence causing inconvenience to everyone.

Original languageEnglish
Article number165986
JournalNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Volume1022
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Performance test of the electromagnetic particle detectors for the LHAASO experiment” [Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1001 (2021) 165193] (Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A (2021) 1001, (S0168900221001777), (10.1016/j.nima.2021.165193))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this