Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correlation between interlayer thickness and diamond/Cu interfacial thermal conductivity at the nanoscale

  • Zihao Yang
  • , Jinglong Zhang
  • , Yu Ma*
  • , Huangshuai Zhang
  • , Zhanqiu Tan
  • , Wenqi Zhang
  • , Hang Zhang
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Beihang University
  • CAS - Institute of Engineering Thermophysics
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • City University of Hong Kong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To elucidate the correlation between the interlayer thickness and the interfacial thermal conductivity (ITC) of the diamond/Cu interface at the nanoscale, diamond/W(WC)/Cu nanolayered structures with varying interlayer thicknesses were prepared by magnetron sputtering, and their ITC was directly measured by time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR) system. The results indicate that an excessively thin interlayer enhances interfacial scattering, thereby shortening the effective mean free path (MFP) of hot carriers, which suppresses thermal transport and limits the overall thermal conductivity. When the interlayer thickness approaches the MFP of hot carriers, the significantly reduced interfacial scattering promotes cross-interface transport, resulting in peak ITC of 101.5 MW/(m2·K) for W (20 nm) and 88 MW/(m2·K) for WC (15 nm), respectively. However, further increasing the interlayer thickness introduces considerable bulk thermal resistance and defect scattering, which decreases the transport efficiency of hot carriers and ultimately reduces the ITC at the diamond/Cu interface.

Original languageEnglish
Article number164882
JournalApplied Surface Science
Volume718
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Feb 2026

Keywords

  • Diamond/copper composites
  • Interfacial thermal conductivity
  • Interlayer thickness
  • Magnetron sputtering
  • Time-domain thermoreflectance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correlation between interlayer thickness and diamond/Cu interfacial thermal conductivity at the nanoscale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this