Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Constraining the Cosmic-Ray Energy Based on Observations of Nearby Galaxy Clusters by LHAASO

  • Zhen Cao
  • , F. Aharonian
  • , Y. X. Bai
  • , Y. W. Bao
  • , D. Bastieri
  • , X. J. Bi
  • , Y. J. Bi
  • , W. Bian
  • , A. V. Bukevich
  • , C. M. Cai
  • , W. Y. Cao*
  • , Zhe Cao
  • , J. Chang
  • , J. F. Chang
  • , A. M. Chen
  • , E. S. Chen
  • , H. X. Chen
  • , Liang Chen
  • , Long Chen
  • , M. J. Chen
  • M. L. Chen, Q. H. Chen, S. Chen, S. H. Chen, S. Z. Chen, T. L. Chen, X. B. Chen, X. J. Chen, Y. Chen, N. Cheng, Y. D. Cheng, M. C. Chu, M. Y. Cui, S. W. Cui, X. H. Cui, Y. D. Cui, B. Z. Dai, H. L. Dai, Z. G. Dai, Danzengluobu, Y. X. Diao, X. Q. Dong, K. K. Duan, J. H. Fan, Y. Z. Fan, J. Fang, J. H. Fang, K. Fang, C. F. Feng, H. Feng, L. Feng, S. H. Feng, X. T. Feng, Y. Feng, Y. L. Feng, S. Gabici, B. Gao, C. D. Gao, Q. Gao, W. Gao, W. K. Gao, M. M. Ge, T. T. Ge, L. S. Geng, G. Giacinti, G. H. Gong, Q. B. Gou, M. H. Gu, F. L. Guo, J. Guo, X. L. Guo, Y. Q. Guo, Y. Y. Guo, Y. A. Han, O. A. Hannuksela, M. Hasan, H. H. He, H. N. He, J. Y. He, X. Y. He, Y. He, S. Hernández-Cadena, Y. K. Hor, B. W. Hou, C. Hou, X. Hou, H. B. Hu, S. C. Hu, C. Huang, D. H. Huang, J. J. Huang, T. Q. Huang, W. J. Huang, X. T. Huang, X. Y. Huang, Y. Huang, Y. Y. Huang, X. L. Ji, H. Y. Jia, K. Jia, H. B. Jiang, K. Jiang, X. W. Jiang, Z. J. Jiang, M. Jin, S. Kaci, M. M. Kang, I. Karpikov, D. Khangulyan, D. Kuleshov, K. Kurinov, B. B. Li, Cheng Li, Cong Li, D. Li, F. Li, H. B. Li, H. C. Li, Jian Li, Jie Li, K. Li, L. Li, R. L. Li, S. D. Li, T. Y. Li, W. L. Li, X. R. Li, Xin Li, Y. Z. Li, Zhe Li, Zhuo Li, E. W. Liang, Y. F. Liang, S. J. Lin, B. Liu, C. Liu, D. Liu, D. B. Liu, H. Liu, H. D. Liu, J. Liu, J. L. Liu, J. R. Liu, M. Y. Liu, R. Y. Liu, S. M. Liu, W. Liu, X. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. N. Liu, Y. Q. Lou, Q. Luo, Y. Luo, H. K. Lv, B. Q. Ma, L. L. Ma, X. H. Ma, J. R. Mao, Z. Min, W. Mitthumsiri, G. B. Mou, H. J. Mu, Y. C. Nan, A. Neronov, K. C.Y. Ng, M. Y. Ni, L. Nie, L. J. Ou, P. Pattarakijwanich, Z. Y. Pei, J. C. Qi, M. Y. Qi, J. J. Qin, A. Raza, C. Y. Ren, D. Ruffolo, A. Sáiz, M. Saeed, D. Semikoz, L. Shao, O. Shchegolev, Y. Z. Shen, X. D. Sheng, Z. D. Shi, F. W. Shu, H. C. Song, Yu V. Stenkin, V. Stepanov, Y. Su, D. X. Sun, H. Sun, Q. N. Sun, X. N. Sun, Z. B. Sun, N. H. Tabasam, J. Takata, P. H.T. Tam, H. B. Tan, Q. W. Tang, R. Tang, Z. B. Tang, W. W. Tian, C. N. Tong, L. H. Wan, C. Wang, G. W. Wang, H. G. Wang, H. H. Wang, J. C. Wang, K. Wang, Kai Wang, Kai Wang, L. P. Wang, L. Y. Wang, L. Y. Wang, R. Wang, W. Wang, X. G. Wang, X. J. Wang, X. Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. D. Wang, Z. H. Wang, Z. X. Wang, Zheng Wang, D. M. Wei, J. J. Wei, Y. J. Wei, T. Wen, S. S. Weng, C. Y. Wu, H. R. Wu, Q. W. Wu, S. Wu, X. F. Wu, Y. S. Wu, S. Q. Xi, J. Xia, J. J. Xia, G. M. Xiang, D. X. Xiao, G. Xiao, Y. L. Xin, Y. Xing, D. R. Xiong, Z. Xiong, D. L. Xu, R. F. Xu, R. X. Xu, W. L. Xu, L. Xue, D. H. Yan, J. Z. Yan, T. Yan, C. W. Yang, C. Y. Yang, F. F. Yang, L. L. Yang, M. J. Yang, R. Z. Yang*, W. X. Yang, Y. H. Yao, Z. G. Yao, X. A. Ye, L. Q. Yin, N. Yin, X. H. You, Z. Y. You, Y. H. Yu*, Q. Yuan, H. Yue, H. D. Zeng, T. X. Zeng, W. Zeng, M. Zha, B. B. Zhang, B. T. Zhang, F. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. M. Zhang, H. Y. Zhang, J. L. Zhang, Li Zhang, P. F. Zhang, P. P. Zhang, R. Zhang, S. R. Zhang, S. S. Zhang, W. Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, X. P. Zhang, Yi Zhang, Yong Zhang, Z. P. Zhang, J. Zhao, L. Zhao, L. Z. Zhao, S. P. Zhao, X. H. Zhao, Z. H. Zhao, F. Zheng, W. J. Zhong, B. Zhou, H. Zhou, J. N. Zhou, M. Zhou, P. Zhou, R. Zhou, X. X. Zhou, X. X. Zhou, B. Y. Zhu, C. G. Zhu, F. R. Zhu, H. Zhu, K. J. Zhu, Y. C. Zou, X. Zuo
*Corresponding author for this work
  • CAS - Institute of High Energy Physics
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • TIANFU Cosmic Ray Research Center
  • University of Science and Technology of China
  • Yerevan State University
  • Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Guangzhou University
  • Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Southwest Jiaotong University
  • University of Science and Technology of China
  • CAS - Purple Mountain Observatory
  • Zhejiang Lab
  • CAS - Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  • Yunnan University
  • Tibet University
  • Nanjing University
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Hebei Normal University
  • CAS - National Astronomical Observatories
  • Sun Yat-Sen University
  • Shandong University
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Tsinghua University
  • Zhengzhou University
  • China Center of Advanced Science and Technology World Laboratory
  • Sichuan University
  • Nanchang University
  • Peking University
  • Guangxi University
  • Mahidol University
  • Nanjing Normal University
  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
  • CAS - National Space Science Center
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Galaxy clusters act as reservoirs of high-energy cosmic rays (CRs). As CRs propagate through the intracluster medium, they generate diffuse γ-rays detectable by arrays such as LHAASO. These γ-rays result from proton-proton (pp) collisions of very high-energy cosmic rays or inverse Compton (IC) scattering of positron-electron pairs created by pγ interactions of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs). We analyzed diffuse γ-ray emission from the Coma, Perseus, and Virgo clusters using LHAASO data. Diffuse emission was modeled as a disk of radius R500 for each cluster while accounting for point sources. No significant diffuse emission was detected, yielding 95% confidence level (C.L.) upper limits on the γ-ray flux: for WCDA (1-25 TeV) and KM2A (>25 TeV), less than (49.4, 13.7, 54.0) and (1.34, 1.14, 0.40) × 10−14 ph cm−2 s−1 for Coma, Perseus, and Virgo, respectively. The γ-ray upper limits can be used to derive model-independent constraints on the integral energy of cosmic ray protons above 10 TeV (corresponding to the LHAASO observational range >1 TeV under the pp scenario) to be less than (1.96, 0.59, 0.08) × 1061 erg. The absence of detectable annuli/ring-like structures, indicative of cluster accretion or merging shocks, imposes further constraints on models in which the UHECRs are accelerated in the merging shocks of galaxy clusters.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberL19
JournalAstrophysical Journal Letters
Volume982
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Mar 2025
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constraining the Cosmic-Ray Energy Based on Observations of Nearby Galaxy Clusters by LHAASO'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this