Comparison of IAU1976, 1980 and IAU2000A precession-nutation model

Wang Mingming; Luo Jianjun; Ma Weihua

Comparison of IAU1976, 1980 and IAU2000A precession-nutation model

Wang Mingming^*
, Luo Jianjun
, Ma Weihua

^*Corresponding author for this work

Northwestern Polytechnical University Xian

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

For precise satellite orbit determination, the transformation should be done between the Celestial Reference Frame (CRF) and the Terrestrial Reference Frame (TRF). Precession and nutation should be considered during coordinate transformation from the CRF to the TRF. IAU1976 precession model, IAU1980 nutation model and IAU2000A precession-nutation model were presented, the differences were compared with IAU2000A precession-nutation model. The results indicate that IAU2000A model is more precise.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	42-47+53
Journal	Zhongguo Kongjian Kexue Jishu/Chinese Space Science and Technology
Volume	29
Issue number	5
State	Published - Oct 2009
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Barycentric dynamic time
Coordinate transformation
Nutation
Precession
Terrestrial dynamic time

Cite this

@article{c31bcacbe9ca45cbac7e3ccb3f953ef6,

title = "Comparison of IAU1976, 1980 and IAU2000A precession-nutation model",

abstract = "For precise satellite orbit determination, the transformation should be done between the Celestial Reference Frame (CRF) and the Terrestrial Reference Frame (TRF). Precession and nutation should be considered during coordinate transformation from the CRF to the TRF. IAU1976 precession model, IAU1980 nutation model and IAU2000A precession-nutation model were presented, the differences were compared with IAU2000A precession-nutation model. The results indicate that IAU2000A model is more precise.",

keywords = "Barycentric dynamic time, Coordinate transformation, Nutation, Precession, Terrestrial dynamic time",

author = "Wang Mingming and Luo Jianjun and Ma Weihua",

year = "2009",

month = oct,

language = "英语",

volume = "29",

pages = "42--47+53",

journal = "Zhongguo Kongjian Kexue Jishu/Chinese Space Science and Technology",

issn = "1000-758X",

publisher = "Chinese Academy of Space Technology",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of IAU1976, 1980 and IAU2000A precession-nutation model

AU - Mingming, Wang

AU - Jianjun, Luo

AU - Weihua, Ma

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - For precise satellite orbit determination, the transformation should be done between the Celestial Reference Frame (CRF) and the Terrestrial Reference Frame (TRF). Precession and nutation should be considered during coordinate transformation from the CRF to the TRF. IAU1976 precession model, IAU1980 nutation model and IAU2000A precession-nutation model were presented, the differences were compared with IAU2000A precession-nutation model. The results indicate that IAU2000A model is more precise.

AB - For precise satellite orbit determination, the transformation should be done between the Celestial Reference Frame (CRF) and the Terrestrial Reference Frame (TRF). Precession and nutation should be considered during coordinate transformation from the CRF to the TRF. IAU1976 precession model, IAU1980 nutation model and IAU2000A precession-nutation model were presented, the differences were compared with IAU2000A precession-nutation model. The results indicate that IAU2000A model is more precise.

KW - Barycentric dynamic time

KW - Coordinate transformation

KW - Nutation

KW - Precession

KW - Terrestrial dynamic time

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/73849088397

M3 - 文章

AN - SCOPUS:73849088397

SN - 1000-758X

VL - 29

SP - 42-47+53

JO - Zhongguo Kongjian Kexue Jishu/Chinese Space Science and Technology

JF - Zhongguo Kongjian Kexue Jishu/Chinese Space Science and Technology

IS - 5

ER -

Comparison of IAU1976, 1980 and IAU2000A precession-nutation model

Abstract

Keywords

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this