Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of different definitions of the geometric measure of entanglement

  • Lin Chen*
  • , Martin Aulbach
  • , Michal Hajdušek
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Several inequivalent definitions of the geometric measure of entanglement (GM) have been introduced and studied in the past. Here we review several known and new definitions, with the qualifying criterion being that for pure states the measure is a linear or logarithmic function of the maximal fidelity with product states. The entanglement axioms and properties of the measures are studied, and qualitative and quantitative comparisons are made between all definitions. Streltsov et al. [New J. Phys. 12, 123004 (2010)NJOPFM1367-263010. 1088/1367-2630/12/12/123004] proved the equivalence of two linear definitions of GM, whereas we show that the corresponding logarithmic definitions are distinct. Certain classes of states such as "maximally correlated states" and isotropic states are particularly valuable for this analysis. A little-known GM definition is found to be the first one to be both normalized and weakly monotonous, thus being a prime candidate for future studies of multipartite entanglement. We also find that a large class of graph states, which includes all cluster states, have a "universal" closest separable state that minimizes the quantum relative entropy, the Bures distance, and the trace distance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number042305
JournalPhysical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
Volume89
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 Apr 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of different definitions of the geometric measure of entanglement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this