Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing radiomics models with different inputs for accurate diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic liver disease

  • Xue Lu
  • , Hui Zhou
  • , Kun Wang
  • , Jieyang Jin
  • , Fankun Meng
  • , Xiaojie Mu
  • , Shuoyang Li
  • , Rongqin Zheng*
  • , Jie Tian*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
  • CAS - Institute of Automation
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Capital Medical University
  • University of Wollongong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The non-invasive discrimination of significant fibrosis (≥ F2) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) is clinically critical but technically challenging. We aimed to develop an updated deep learning radiomics model of elastography (DLRE2.0) based on our previous DLRE model to achieve significantly improved performance in ≥ F2 evaluation. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study with 807 CLD patients and 4842 images from three hospitals. All of these patients have liver biopsy results as referenced standard. Multichannel deep learning radiomics models were developed. Elastography images, gray-scale images of the liver capsule, gray-scale images of the liver parenchyma, and serological results were gradually integrated to establish different diagnosis models, and the optimal model was selected for assessing ≥ F2. Its accuracy was thoroughly investigated by applying different F0–1 prevalence cohorts and independent external test cohorts. Analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was performed to calculate the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for significance of fibrosis (≥ F2) and cirrhosis (F4). Results: The AUC of the DLRE2.0 model significantly increased to 0.91 compared with the DLRE model (AUC 0.83) when evaluating ≥ F2 (p = 0.0167). However, it did not show statistically significant differences as integrating gray-scale images and serological data into the DLRE2.0 model. AUCs of DLRE and DLRE2.0 increased, when there was higher F0–1 prevalence. All radiomics models had good robustness in the independent external test cohort. Conclusions: DLRE2.0 was the most suitable model for staging significant fibrosis while considering the balance of diagnostic accuracy and clinical practicability. Key Points: • The non-invasive discrimination of significant fibrosis (≥ F2) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) is clinically critical but technically challenging. • We aimed to develop an updated deep learning radiomics model of elastography (DLRE2.0) based on our previous DLRE model to achieve significantly improved performance in ≥ F2 evaluation. • Our study based on 807 CLD patients and 4842 images with liver biopsy found that DLRE2.0 was the most suitable model for staging significant fibrosis while considering the balance of diagnostic accuracy and clinical practicability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8743-8754
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume31
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Deep learning
  • Elasticity imaging techniques
  • Hepatic cirrhosis
  • Liver disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing radiomics models with different inputs for accurate diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic liver disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this