Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Commissioning and clinical implementation of an Autoencoder based Classification-Regression model for VMAT patient-specific QA in a multi-institution scenario

  • Ruijie Yang
  • , Xueying Yang
  • , Le Wang
  • , Dingjie Li
  • , Yuexin Guo
  • , Ying Li
  • , Yumin Guan
  • , Xiangyang Wu
  • , Shouping Xu
  • , Shuming Zhang
  • , Maria F. Chan
  • , Lisheng Geng*
  • , Jing Sui
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Peking University
  • Beihang University
  • CAS - Institute of Automation
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Henan Cancer Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
  • Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital
  • Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital
  • General Hospital of People's Liberation Army
  • Beijing Hospital
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Beijing Normal University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and purpose: To commission and implement an Autoencoder based Classification-Regression (ACLR) model for VMAT patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) in a multi-institution scenario. Materials and methods: 1835 VMAT plans from seven institutions were collected for the ACLR model commissioning and multi-institutional validation. We established three scenarios to validate the gamma passing rates (GPRs) prediction and classification accuracy with the ACLR model for different delivery equipment, QA devices, and treatment planning systems (TPS). The prediction performance of the ACLR model was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The classification performance was evaluated using sensitivity and specificity. An independent end-to-end test (E2E) and routine QA of the ACLR model were performed to validate the clinical use of the model. Results: For multi-institution validations, the MAEs were 1.30–2.80% and 2.42–4.60% at 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm, respectively, and RMSEs were 1.55–2.98% and 2.83–4.95% at 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm, respectively, with different delivery equipment, QA devices, and TPS, while the sensitivity was 90% and specificity was 70.1% at 3%/2 mm. For the E2E, the deviations between the predicted and measured results were within 3%, and the model passed the consistency check for clinical implementation. The predicted results of the model were the same in daily QA, while the deviations between the repeated monthly measured GPRs were all within 2%. Conclusions: The performance of the ACLR model in multi-institution scenarios was validated on a large scale. Routine QA of the ACLR model was established and the model could be used for VMAT PSQA clinically.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-240
Number of pages11
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume161
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Clinical implementation
  • Commissioning
  • Machine learning
  • Multi-institution validation
  • VMAT patient-specific QA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Commissioning and clinical implementation of an Autoencoder based Classification-Regression model for VMAT patient-specific QA in a multi-institution scenario'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this