Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Characteristics of the Irrigant Flow in a Simulated Lateral Canal Under Two Typical Laser-Activated Irrigation Regimens

  • Zheng Su
  • , Zhibo Li
  • , Ya Shen
  • , Yuhao Bai
  • , Ying Zheng
  • , Chong Pan*
  • , Benxiang Hou*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Capital Medical University
  • Beihang University
  • University of British Columbia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) and shockwave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) are two promising laser-activated irrigation (LAI) methods for root canal irrigation. Their performance in driving irrigant flush in a complex root canal system will be evaluated by microscale particle image velocimetry (μPIV) measurement and will be compared with that of ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI). Study Design/Materials and Methods: A μPIV system with 7 μm fluorescent tracer particles was adopted to measure two-dimensional (2D) velocity fields around the junction region, with a size of 1.8 mm × 1.5 mm, between one main canal and one lateral canal in an endodontic training block, which was driven by SWEEPS (Er:YAG laser) operating at 15 Hz and 20 mJ. The flow field driven by PIPS (Er:YAG laser) at the same frequency and energy, as well as by UAI (with non-cutting insert) operating at 40% unit power, was also measured for a direct comparison. Results: It was found that both SWEEPS and PIPS can activate a so-called “breath mode” during the irrigation. Namely, the induced irrigant flush presented a back-and-forth oscillation along both the main canal and the lateral one. The maximum flow speed in the lateral canal was observed to be up to 10 m/s in the SWEEPS modality, while reduced to around 7 m/s in the PIPS modality. The penetration length in the lateral canal in both modalities was estimated to be larger than 1 mm. In comparison, the flow field induced by UAI was characterized as irregular vortical structures, the maximum flow speed in the lateral canal was 0.15 m/s and significantly lower than LAI (P < 0.01), and the penetration length was less than 300 μm and lower than LAI (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared to UAI, PIPS, and SWEEPS are more capable of delivering the irrigant deeper into the lateral canal. Furthermore, the back-and-forth flush in the breath mode is ideal for removing debris during irrigation. Lasers Surg. Med.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)587-594
Number of pages8
JournalLasers in Surgery and Medicine
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • lateral canal
  • microscale particle image velocimetry
  • photon-induced photoacoustic streaming
  • shockwave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming
  • ultrasonic-activated irrigation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characteristics of the Irrigant Flow in a Simulated Lateral Canal Under Two Typical Laser-Activated Irrigation Regimens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this