TY - GEN
T1 - Automatic asymmetric 3D-2D face recognition
AU - Huang, Di
AU - Ardabilian, Mohsen
AU - Wang, Yunhong
AU - Chen, Liming
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - 3D Face recognition has been considered as a major solution to deal with unsolved issues of reliable 2D face recognition in recent years, i.e. lighting and pose variations. However, 3D techniques are currently limited by their high registration and computation cost. In this paper, an asymmetric 3D-2D face recognition method is presented, enrolling in textured 3D whilst performing automatic identification using only 2D facial images. The goal is to limit the use of 3D data to where it really helps to improve face recognition accuracy. The proposed approach contains two separate matching steps: Sparse Representation Classifier (SRC) is applied to 2D-2D matching, while Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) is exploited to learn the mapping between range LBP faces (3D) and texture LBP faces (2D). Both matching scores are combined for the final decision. Moreover, we propose a new preprocessing pipeline to enhance robustness to lighting and pose effects. The proposed method achieves better experimental results in the FRGC v2.0 dataset than 2D methods do, but avoiding the cost and inconvenience of data acquisition and computation of 3D approaches.
AB - 3D Face recognition has been considered as a major solution to deal with unsolved issues of reliable 2D face recognition in recent years, i.e. lighting and pose variations. However, 3D techniques are currently limited by their high registration and computation cost. In this paper, an asymmetric 3D-2D face recognition method is presented, enrolling in textured 3D whilst performing automatic identification using only 2D facial images. The goal is to limit the use of 3D data to where it really helps to improve face recognition accuracy. The proposed approach contains two separate matching steps: Sparse Representation Classifier (SRC) is applied to 2D-2D matching, while Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) is exploited to learn the mapping between range LBP faces (3D) and texture LBP faces (2D). Both matching scores are combined for the final decision. Moreover, we propose a new preprocessing pipeline to enhance robustness to lighting and pose effects. The proposed method achieves better experimental results in the FRGC v2.0 dataset than 2D methods do, but avoiding the cost and inconvenience of data acquisition and computation of 3D approaches.
KW - Asymmetric, 3D, 2D face recognition
KW - Canonical correlation analysis
KW - Sparse representation classifier
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78149491972
U2 - 10.1109/ICPR.2010.305
DO - 10.1109/ICPR.2010.305
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:78149491972
SN - 9780769541099
T3 - Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition
SP - 1225
EP - 1228
BT - Proceedings - 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2010
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ER -