Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence Enhanced Two-Stage Hybrid Fault Prognosis Methodology of PMSM

  • Baoping Cai*
  • , Zhengda Wang
  • , Hongmin Zhu
  • , Yonghong Liu
  • , Keke Hao
  • , Ziqi Yang
  • , Yi Ren
  • , Qiang Feng
  • , Zengkai Liu
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • China University of Petroleum (East China)
  • Imperial College London
  • CRRC Qingdao Sifang Rolling Stock Research Institute Company Ltd.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Fault prognosis based on single model is generally inaccurate due to the varying working conditions. A multistage fault prognosis methodology combining stage identification with Bayesian networks (BNs) and time series approach with particular emphasis on the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model is proposed to solve this problem. In the first stage, degradation data are identified, and outliers are marked by the Euclidean distance. Degenerate attributes of outliers are finely identified by BNs and matched to the corresponding model. In the second stage, the ARMA model is used for prognosis according to the results of the fine identification. Subsequently, the double-precision identification and ARMA submodel prognosis are carried out alternately throughout the prognosis process. Three degradation types of permanent magnet synchronous motor are simulated to verify the applicability of the method. Result shows that it can track the changes in the degradation in time and obtains better results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7262-7273
Number of pages12
JournalIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2022

Keywords

  • Autoregressive moving average (ARMA)
  • Bayesian networks (BNs)
  • fault prognosis
  • permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Artificial Intelligence Enhanced Two-Stage Hybrid Fault Prognosis Methodology of PMSM'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this