Abstract
The phenomenological Rivlin constitutive model of incompressible rubber materials is investigated in this paper. The advantages and disadvantages of several models, including the neo-Hookean formulation, the Mooney formulation, the three-order Rivlin formulation and the Ogden formulation, are analyzed. Subsequently, an improved Rivlin formulation is proposed as W=B 00(A 3-3)+∑(i+j=1)(N) B ij(A 1-3) i (A 2-3) j, which has two significant advantages: (1) in the case of N=1 and small strain, the new function is the same as the strain-energy of the linear elastic incompressible material, and depicts approximately linear shear deformation and exactly linear tension and compression deformation. (2) when N≥2, in the condition of small strain, using the new formulation, the strain-energy and shear stress in simple shear experiment are polynomial with γ xy as geometric proportion. While using Rivlin formulation, the strain-energy and shear stress τ xy under small deformation are polynomial with (γ xy) 2 as geometric proportion. Besides, when the deformation is small, Rivlin formulation with N=1 (Mooney) provides constant shear module and non-linear relationship in tension and compression. The improved form, compared with the same order original Rivlin formulation, shows significant advantages in prediction of test data in single test, and has a good performance in the mutual prediction between different tests.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 408-414 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Guti Lixue Xuebao/Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Aug 2012 |
Keywords
- Hyperelastic
- Rivlin model
- Rubber
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An improved Rivlin model of hyperelastic rubber materials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver