Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An analysis of interoperability in materials and manufacturing: Definitions, classifications, requirements, and recommendations

  • Silvia Chiacchiera*
  • , John Breslin
  • , Ana Teresa Correia
  • , Jesper Friis
  • , Emanuele Ghedini
  • , Gerhard Goldbeck
  • , Martin Thomas Horsch
  • , Mohamed Hedi Karray
  • , Bjørn Tore Løvfall
  • , Jinzhi Lu
  • , Ilaria Maria Paponetti
  • , María Poveda-Villalón
  • , Arkopaul Sarkar
  • , Umutcan Serles
  • , Ilian T. Todorov
  • , Noel Vizcaino
  • , Lan Yang
  • , Francesco Antonio Zaccarini
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • STFC Daresbury Laboratory
  • University of Galway
  • ATB - Institute for Applied Systems Technology
  • SINTEF
  • University of Bologna
  • Goldbeck Consulting Ltd
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences
  • University of Technology Tarbes Occitanie Pyrénées
  • Technical University of Madrid
  • Georgetown University
  • Onlim GmbH

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the interoperability landscape for materials and manufacturing in a broad sense and with a particular focus in the context of data. To set the stage and give an overview of the various facets of this topic, we collect and compare existing definitions and classifications of interoperability (its types, layers, levels) and summarize recommendations from various entities and communities. After this, we carry out an analysis on a set of interoperability scenarios, propose a broad structure of requirements for interoperability, and list some key components that can be used to meet these requirements, with a particular emphasis on the role of semantic technologies and knowledge representation. Finally, we highlight future challenges and suggest directions for best practices. Throughout the paper, we emphasize common points and differences in the landscape. Through this process, relevant dimensions are identified, and various tables are provided with useful syntheses and structured categorizations that can serve as a base for future theoretical work, as well as immediate practical guidance (e.g., for requirements gathering, literature navigation).

Original languageEnglish
Article number101116
JournalJournal of Industrial Information Integration
Volume51
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2026

Keywords

  • Classifications
  • Definitions
  • Interoperability
  • Knowledge representation
  • Ontology
  • Recommendations
  • Terminology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An analysis of interoperability in materials and manufacturing: Definitions, classifications, requirements, and recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this