Accuracy and reproducibility of 3D digital tooth preparations made by gypsum materials of various colors

  • Fa Bing Tan
  • , Chao Wang
  • , Hong Wei Dai
  • , Yu Bo Fan
  • , Jin Lin Song*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE. The study aimed to identify the accuracy and reproducibility of preparations made by gypsum materials of various colors using quantitative and semi-quantitative three-dimensional (3D) approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A titanium maxillary first molar preparation was created as reference dataset (REF). Silicone impressions were duplicated from REF and randomized into 6 groups (n=8). Gypsum preparations were formed and grouped according to the color of gypsum materials, and light-scanned to obtain prepared datasets (PRE). Then, in terms of accuracy, PRE were superimposed on REF using the best-fit-algorithm and PRE underwent intragroup pairwise best-fit alignment for assessing reproducibility. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) and degrees of similarity (DS) were computed and analyzed with SPSS 20.0 statistical software (a=.05). RESULTS. In terms of accuracy, PREs in 3D directions were increased in the 6 color groups (from 19.38 to 20.88 μm), of which the marginal and internal variations ranged 51.36 - 58.26 μm and 18.33 - 20.04 μm, respectively. On the other hand, RMSD value and DS-scores did not show significant differences among groups. Regarding reproducibility, both RMSD and DS-scores showed statistically significant differences among groups, while RMSD values of the 6 color groups were less than 5 μm, of which blue color group was the smallest (3.27 ± 0.24 μm) and white color group was the largest (4.24 ± 0.36 μm). These results were consistent with the DS data. CONCLUSION. The 3D volume of the PREs was predisposed towards an increase during digitalization, which was unaffected by gypsum color. Furthermore, the reproducibility of digitalizing scanning differed negligibly among different gypsum colors, especially in comparison to clinically observed discrepancies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-17
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Color
  • Dental gypsum materials
  • Reproducibility
  • Three-dimensional analysis

Cite this