Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A computational framework for Karl Popper’s logic of scientific discovery

  • Wei Li
  • , Yuefei Sui*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Belief revision is both a philosophical and logical problem. From Popper’s logic of scientific discovery, we know that revision is ubiquitous in physics and other sciences. The AGM postulates and R-calculus are approaches from logic, where the R-calculus is a Gentzen-type concrete belief revision operator. Because deduction is undecidable in first-order logic, we apply approximate deduction to derive an R-calculus that is computational and has finite injury. We further develop approximation algorithms for SAT problems to derive a feasible R-calculus based on the relation between deduction and satisfiability. In this manner, we provide a full spectrum of belief revision: from philosophical to feasible revision.

Original languageEnglish
Article number042101
JournalScience China Information Sciences
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2018

Keywords

  • approximate deduction
  • approximation algorithms
  • belief revision
  • feasible computation
  • logic of scientific discovery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A computational framework for Karl Popper’s logic of scientific discovery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this